Re: Newbie-esque problem
Posted by
roundrocktom@y...
on 2001-10-30 07:31:18 UTC
Wilson,
Dan already pointed out a good linear solution.
My concern is the movement may bind with the motorcycle
forks. You might want to look at how a rotary encoder
is used for linear measurement.
Darn... can not find the DRO stuff, but basically
you are converting linear motion into rotary motion
and measuring the rotary motion.
A wire is wrapped around a drum, that has an internal
spring. As you pull the wire the drum rotates, and will
also draw the wire back in. At least no problem with
binding, but vibration of the wire may cause errors.
Tom Walter
Round Rock, TX.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Intellicorp001 <intellicorp001@m...>
wrote:
Dan already pointed out a good linear solution.
My concern is the movement may bind with the motorcycle
forks. You might want to look at how a rotary encoder
is used for linear measurement.
Darn... can not find the DRO stuff, but basically
you are converting linear motion into rotary motion
and measuring the rotary motion.
A wire is wrapped around a drum, that has an internal
spring. As you pull the wire the drum rotates, and will
also draw the wire back in. At least no problem with
binding, but vibration of the wire may cause errors.
Tom Walter
Round Rock, TX.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Intellicorp001 <intellicorp001@m...>
wrote:
> Hi All,feel for
>
> I've been lurking around here since July. I've been getting a
> whats available, what I might need & what I can afford. The level ofthose who
> expertise on this board is just awesome & I'd like to thank all
> generously contribute their time.some
>
> I have a teensy problem at the moment & I wonder if I could get
> advice. I want to record the movement of my motorcycle front forks.I have a
> recording device (pic microprocessor based) and I want to feed itwith
> positional information about what the forks are getting up to. Ihad first
> thought about a slide potentiometer but pricey much? Wow, I'mlooking to
> spend $50 not $500. Resolution wise, analog would be overkill,steps of 100
> would be great, steps of 20 would be sufficient.accuracy
>
> You guys measure position all the time, admittedly with way more
> than I want, but can you think of a cheapy, rugged (waterproofwould be nice
> to have) way for me to 'read' the position of my forks ?off-topic
>
> Sorry this isn't on topic but you don't have a coffee_lounge for
> posts.your choice'
>
> Time is money & money is beer so there's a case of 'the beer of
> for the best answer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wilson Logan.
>
>
> "Beer is good, beer is our friend".
Discussion Thread
Intellicorp001
2001-10-30 00:43:18 UTC
Newbie-esque problem
Ian Wright
2001-10-30 04:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Dan Mauch
2001-10-30 07:01:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
roundrocktom@y...
2001-10-30 07:31:18 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
andy@o...
2001-10-30 08:41:05 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 09:39:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Newbie-esque problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-30 11:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Jon Elson
2001-10-30 20:50:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 21:16:34 UTC
Fork-travel problem - missing the forest for the trees?
Intellicorp001
2001-10-31 01:33:22 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
John Barnwell
2001-10-31 20:33:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem