Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-11-09 21:44:13 UTC
Rick Miller wrote:
I'm using 1/2" end-supported shafting in a laser photoplotter with a carriage weighing
less than 1 Lb. I had to put in a foam pad for damping, because the vibrations
from the stepper motor set it ringing. There's no way a couple of 1/2" shafts
could support even the lightest of milling operations with an extension of more than
6" or so. unless your spindle will be a Dremel tool, I think you should forget 1/2"
altogether, and go for at LEAST 3/4". You will still have a lot of play under light
load. But, then, maybe I'm spoiled by my Bridgeport.
Jon
> Hi,There's no need to do the calculation, 1/2" is WAY too flexible for machining.
> Could anyone point me to a resource telling me how much a certain material will bend if it is X long and has Y load applied to it? I'm trying to decide if I can get away with using 1/2" dia. end supported shafting on my mill or if I'm going to need continuously supported shafting.
> I'm concerned the end-supported may bow too much under load, causing innacuracy or leading to things binding up on me. The continuously supported shafting though is much more expensive.
> Also, has anyone had any experience using frelon bearings?
I'm using 1/2" end-supported shafting in a laser photoplotter with a carriage weighing
less than 1 Lb. I had to put in a foam pad for damping, because the vibrations
from the stepper motor set it ringing. There's no way a couple of 1/2" shafts
could support even the lightest of milling operations with an extension of more than
6" or so. unless your spindle will be a Dremel tool, I think you should forget 1/2"
altogether, and go for at LEAST 3/4". You will still have a lot of play under light
load. But, then, maybe I'm spoiled by my Bridgeport.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Rick Miller
2001-11-09 15:18:31 UTC
shafting question
machines@n...
2001-11-09 15:37:55 UTC
Re: shafting question
ccs@m...
2001-11-09 15:41:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-09 16:02:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-09 16:44:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
Jon Elson
2001-11-09 21:44:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
andesign2@y...
2001-11-09 23:40:33 UTC
Re: shafting question
ballendo@y...
2001-11-12 00:41:50 UTC
Re: shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-12 15:03:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shafting question
ballendo@y...
2001-11-13 15:24:13 UTC
follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-13 17:05:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
thscarince@h...
2001-11-14 06:20:26 UTC
follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
Eric Keller
2001-11-14 15:56:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question