follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
Posted by
thscarince@h...
on 2001-11-14 06:20:26 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., ballendo@y... wrote:
<snip>
> One claimed advantage of the pacific bearings is that they DONT
> (according TO pacific) increase their "clearance"(slop) as quickly
as
> some other type of plane bearings (such as sintered bronze;
commonly
> called "oilite"). This, in my experience with these bearings,
appears
> to be true.
<snip>
In my many hours of browsing the coveted McMaster catalog, I've
wondered about a few things:
1. While obviously not suitable for serious machines, unsupported
shafting and sintered bronze bearings has got to be the cheapest way
to build a small machine. Anyone tried this?
2. Why in the world are the drilled shafts and their supports orders
of magnitude more expensive???
- Tom S.
Discussion Thread
Rick Miller
2001-11-09 15:18:31 UTC
shafting question
machines@n...
2001-11-09 15:37:55 UTC
Re: shafting question
ccs@m...
2001-11-09 15:41:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-09 16:02:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-09 16:44:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
Jon Elson
2001-11-09 21:44:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] shafting question
andesign2@y...
2001-11-09 23:40:33 UTC
Re: shafting question
ballendo@y...
2001-11-12 00:41:50 UTC
Re: shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-12 15:03:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shafting question
ballendo@y...
2001-11-13 15:24:13 UTC
follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
Rick Miller
2001-11-13 17:05:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
thscarince@h...
2001-11-14 06:20:26 UTC
follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question
Eric Keller
2001-11-14 15:56:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] follw-up on pacific bearings was Re: shafting question