Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Posted by
Fitch R. Williams
on 2002-02-14 20:23:42 UTC
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:44:20 -0800, Jon Anderson
<janders@...> wrote:
stop.
see what happens. It will radically underfeed coming out but that
shouldn't be a problem.
I also bought a New In the box New Tapmatic N/C-R1 Tapping Head with an
NMTB40 adaptor (which matches my mill) on Ebay for around 25% of the
catalog prices. It covers the next size range up (#10 to 1/2"). I
figure I'll practice with the Procunier which was less than sixty bucks!
Once I get the hang of it, I'll try the other one.
I am guessing that since the spindle is always going in one direction, a
single stop works fine?
Thanks
Fitch
<janders@...> wrote:
>In CNC use with a tool changer, the torque arm is captivated. For mostI can do that. I'll just make an "L" shaped handle to rest against the
>other uses, there's nothing wrong with just letting it ride against a
>stop.
stop.
>Just make sure what ever you do, that you underfeed the tap in.Makes perfect sense. I'll run the spindle as close as I can to 90% and
>Procunier's use a cone clutch that locks up even harder as pressure
>increases. Get ahead of the tap a bit and you run the risk of breaking
>the tap, or maybe even something in the head. Underdriving in both
>directions will do nothing more than increase the wear on the clutches
>somewhat, not likely to cause you any problems.
see what happens. It will radically underfeed coming out but that
shouldn't be a problem.
I also bought a New In the box New Tapmatic N/C-R1 Tapping Head with an
NMTB40 adaptor (which matches my mill) on Ebay for around 25% of the
catalog prices. It covers the next size range up (#10 to 1/2"). I
figure I'll practice with the Procunier which was less than sixty bucks!
Once I get the hang of it, I'll try the other one.
I am guessing that since the spindle is always going in one direction, a
single stop works fine?
Thanks
Fitch
Discussion Thread
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-14 19:29:36 UTC
Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Anderson
2002-02-14 19:39:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-14 20:23:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Anderson
2002-02-14 21:29:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Elson
2002-02-14 22:16:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Elson
2002-02-14 22:30:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-15 04:52:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-15 05:15:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-15 06:43:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Elson
2002-02-15 10:52:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
doug98105
2002-02-15 11:09:40 UTC
Re: Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-15 16:18:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Elson
2002-02-15 22:32:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Jon Elson
2002-02-15 22:52:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle
Fitch R. Williams
2002-02-16 05:14:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Using a tapping attachment with a CNC bore cycle