Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Could EDM really be this simple?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-10 15:22:04 UTC
Ken Jenkins wrote:
controller, the sparking is at a low frequency controlled by the RC time
constant of the components used. I have used this to burn out taps, and
it works pretty well for that. It is not going to burn holes in 1" of steel
in a few hours, though. But, if you want to experiment with EDM, this does
actually work.
Jon
> Could EDM really be this simple??????This is bottom of the line EDM, I assure you. Because there is no pulse
>
> http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jmelson/edm.html
>
controller, the sparking is at a low frequency controlled by the RC time
constant of the components used. I have used this to burn out taps, and
it works pretty well for that. It is not going to burn holes in 1" of steel
in a few hours, though. But, if you want to experiment with EDM, this does
actually work.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ken Jenkins
2002-03-09 23:42:58 UTC
Re: Could EDM really be this simple?
John Bell
2002-03-10 07:21:32 UTC
Double Monitors
Chris Clough
2002-03-10 07:59:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Double Monitors
John Bell
2002-03-10 08:21:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Double Monitors
Paul
2002-03-10 10:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Double Monitors
Josh Lane
2002-03-10 11:14:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Double Monitors
Jon Elson
2002-03-10 15:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Could EDM really be this simple?
Scot Rogers
2002-03-10 23:50:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Could EDM really be this simple?