RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
Posted by
Steve Stallings
on 2002-03-29 02:16:05 UTC
OK, lets try this again from the top.... what I need
to know is which pin of the parallel port the users
of various software would prefer to have the Gecko
step-servo drive's fault signal presented. Different
software may expect different things and I wanted to
make life easier for all concerned.
What is already determined:
1) The circuit is set up to work with the current version
of the 320/340 which provides for paralleling the fault
outputs.
2) This is not an emergency stop system. That is properly
done in hardware outside the PC. As a matter of fact
the Gecko drives will stop (all of them if the fault
signals are wired in parallel) without any aid from
the computer. All that is going on here is that the
PC is being told what happened.
3) It will be possible to also present a signal from a
contact closure (think hardware emergency stop relay)
on the same pin of the PC's printer port. This is
because the board will logically 'OR' the special input
for the Gecko fault input with the corresponding regular
contact closure input.
It would be useful to hear from users of EMC, Master5,
TurboCNC, CNCPro, MaxNC, and any other systems. If
you prefer, or if you have trouble posting to Yahoo,
you can reply to stevesng (at) newsguy (dot) com.
Thanks,
Steve Stallings
to know is which pin of the parallel port the users
of various software would prefer to have the Gecko
step-servo drive's fault signal presented. Different
software may expect different things and I wanted to
make life easier for all concerned.
What is already determined:
1) The circuit is set up to work with the current version
of the 320/340 which provides for paralleling the fault
outputs.
2) This is not an emergency stop system. That is properly
done in hardware outside the PC. As a matter of fact
the Gecko drives will stop (all of them if the fault
signals are wired in parallel) without any aid from
the computer. All that is going on here is that the
PC is being told what happened.
3) It will be possible to also present a signal from a
contact closure (think hardware emergency stop relay)
on the same pin of the PC's printer port. This is
because the board will logically 'OR' the special input
for the Gecko fault input with the corresponding regular
contact closure input.
It would be useful to hear from users of EMC, Master5,
TurboCNC, CNCPro, MaxNC, and any other systems. If
you prefer, or if you have trouble posting to Yahoo,
you can reply to stevesng (at) newsguy (dot) com.
Thanks,
Steve Stallings
> Jon wrote:
>
>Steve Stallings wrote:
>
>> Oops... reading my own post, it was confusing....
>> The feedback that I am referring to is the FAULT
>> signal, not encoder feedback signals.
>
>Ah. You might look at my current scheme, see the first
>schematic on http://pico-systems.com/EMC.html for the
>entire emergency circuit.
Discussion Thread
Steve Stallings
2002-03-25 09:55:29 UTC
question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Steve Stallings
2002-03-25 09:59:23 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
beer@s...
2002-03-25 10:37:58 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-03-25 10:57:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Jon Elson
2002-03-25 11:04:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Jon Elson
2002-03-25 11:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
stephen_stallings
2002-03-27 11:36:06 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
Steve Stallings
2002-03-29 02:16:05 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
dkowalcz2000
2002-03-30 15:24:05 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
ballendo
2002-04-06 07:26:57 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated