Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
Posted by
dkowalcz2000
on 2002-03-30 15:24:05 UTC
Steve,
I'd go with pin 10 if you're not sure which to choose. Just about
all software is configurable in this respect, but that seems to be
the de-facto favorite E-stop pin. Probably because most printer
cards use it to trigger the IRQ.
Dave Kowalczyk
Everett WA
TurboCNC and engineering software --> http://www.dakeng.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "stephen_stallings" <stevesng@n...>
wrote:
I'd go with pin 10 if you're not sure which to choose. Just about
all software is configurable in this respect, but that seems to be
the de-facto favorite E-stop pin. Probably because most printer
cards use it to trigger the IRQ.
Dave Kowalczyk
Everett WA
TurboCNC and engineering software --> http://www.dakeng.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "stephen_stallings" <stevesng@n...>
wrote:
>{snip}
> OK, I have confused things enough... lets try this
> again from the top.... I was hoping to learn
> from the users of various software packages who
> want to use Gecko step-servos:
>
> On which pin of the parallel port would you prefer
> to have the Gecko step-servo drive's fault signal
> presented? Different software may expect different
> things and I wanted to make life easier for all
> concerned by switching the signal accordingly.
>
Discussion Thread
Steve Stallings
2002-03-25 09:55:29 UTC
question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Steve Stallings
2002-03-25 09:59:23 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
beer@s...
2002-03-25 10:37:58 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-03-25 10:57:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Jon Elson
2002-03-25 11:04:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
Jon Elson
2002-03-25 11:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users
stephen_stallings
2002-03-27 11:36:06 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
Steve Stallings
2002-03-29 02:16:05 UTC
RE: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
dkowalcz2000
2002-03-30 15:24:05 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated
ballendo
2002-04-06 07:26:57 UTC
Re: question for potential Gecko 320/340 users - updated