CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298

on 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC
Alan,

Good points. People might even want to make a "Frog" type device or a mill X
power-feed with one. I have a PIC development kit that I haven't touched in
years. I'll have to dust it off and see what we could cram into a PIC. In
the mean time, who can volunteer to design or produce an inexpensive L297 PC
board for us?

Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
ACKSYS Engineering
Upland, CA

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Marconett KM6VV" <KM6VV@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298


> Hi Paul,
>
> Just thinking; I recall someone on the list that has already replaced
> the 'L297 with a PIC. And the PIC could be the heart of a single axis
> "jogger", for a 4th axis rotary table, for example. Kinda like
> Sherline's controller? (Bill's ears perk up). I don't know if it's any
> cheaper, but some things like limit and E-stop switches could be built
> in. Same for PAL (or eqv).
>
> Sure, we need a 3 or 4 axis 'L297 board now! 1/2 step is fine, might
> not even want to bother with full step.
>
> Yeah, I really like the G210's. And a pair of G340's is my next PLANNED
> acquisition!
>
> Alan KM6VV

Discussion Thread

Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Larry Edington 2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Peter Homann 2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 mariss92705 2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC Indexer scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Steven J. Owen 2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC Indexer Keith Bowers 2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer CL 2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer Harvey White 2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer stevenson_engineers 2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC Re: Indexer David A. Frantz 2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer