Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Posted by
Paul R. Hvidston
on 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC
Alan,
Good points. People might even want to make a "Frog" type device or a mill X
power-feed with one. I have a PIC development kit that I haven't touched in
years. I'll have to dust it off and see what we could cram into a PIC. In
the mean time, who can volunteer to design or produce an inexpensive L297 PC
board for us?
Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
ACKSYS Engineering
Upland, CA
Good points. People might even want to make a "Frog" type device or a mill X
power-feed with one. I have a PIC development kit that I haven't touched in
years. I'll have to dust it off and see what we could cram into a PIC. In
the mean time, who can volunteer to design or produce an inexpensive L297 PC
board for us?
Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
ACKSYS Engineering
Upland, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Marconett KM6VV" <KM6VV@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
> Hi Paul,
>
> Just thinking; I recall someone on the list that has already replaced
> the 'L297 with a PIC. And the PIC could be the heart of a single axis
> "jogger", for a 4th axis rotary table, for example. Kinda like
> Sherline's controller? (Bill's ears perk up). I don't know if it's any
> cheaper, but some things like limit and E-stop switches could be built
> in. Same for PAL (or eqv).
>
> Sure, we need a 3 or 4 axis 'L297 board now! 1/2 step is fine, might
> not even want to bother with full step.
>
> Yeah, I really like the G210's. And a pair of G340's is my next PLANNED
> acquisition!
>
> Alan KM6VV
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Tony Jeffree
2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Rothenbush
2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Larry Edington
2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Peter Homann
2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
tonyjeffree
2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
ballendo
2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
mariss92705
2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
tonyjeffree
2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC
Indexer
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC
Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Rothenbush
2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC
Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Steven J. Owen
2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC
Indexer
Keith Bowers
2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
CL
2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
Harvey White
2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
stevenson_engineers
2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC
Re: Indexer
David A. Frantz
2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer