CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298

on 2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Rothenbush" <beer@...>


> Now, to carry this project further, the only "control" logic required over
> and above the PIC to drive the G298 is a comparator.

The PIC16F627 / 628 has 2 built in analog comparators. That's what I used
for my L297
PIC replacement processor on my second generation 10A drivers. So I know the
F628 can replace an L297.

Another processor that is very new is the Cypress PSOC. It has a lot of
analog
and digital features that are programmable and runtime reconfigurable. I'm
using
it in a project at work that has nothing to do with CNC. You might want to
take a look at it. The development kit is cheap and the debugger has some
fantastic features. And you'll need them. The processor has a few warts.

Just for grins, I'm going to do a microstepping driver with it that will use
Fets
for the drive transistors. I think I can even cram a quadrature decoder on
it for
position feedback. That configuration will use up all of it's digital blocks
and most
of it's analog blocks.

later,
Larry E.

Discussion Thread

Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Larry Edington 2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Peter Homann 2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 mariss92705 2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC Indexer scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Steven J. Owen 2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC Indexer Keith Bowers 2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer CL 2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer Harvey White 2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer stevenson_engineers 2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC Re: Indexer David A. Frantz 2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer