CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298

Posted by ballendo
on 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC
Alan,

And while we're at it; can we get Mariss to describe in more detail
an offhand comment he made some time ago, which has stuck with me...

That being something along the lines of: (Mariss "speaking")
Constant time off pwm sucks (he said something more like "has very
poor performance"<G>). Doing it differently is harder to be sure, but
worth it, and I enjoy the challenge...

(constant time off PWM is used in the L297)

Ballendo

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Alan Marconett KM6VV <KM6VV@a...> wrote:
> Hi Mariss, Paul,
>
> Yes! It does sound like an interesting project. Now all we have
to do
> is "publish" a simple plan (and code) for a PIC or PAL replacement
for
> the '97.
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>

Discussion Thread

Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Larry Edington 2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Peter Homann 2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 mariss92705 2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC Indexer scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Steven J. Owen 2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC Indexer Keith Bowers 2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer CL 2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer Harvey White 2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer stevenson_engineers 2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC Re: Indexer David A. Frantz 2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer