next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Posted by
ballendo
on 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC
Alan,
And while we're at it; can we get Mariss to describe in more detail
an offhand comment he made some time ago, which has stuck with me...
That being something along the lines of: (Mariss "speaking")
Constant time off pwm sucks (he said something more like "has very
poor performance"<G>). Doing it differently is harder to be sure, but
worth it, and I enjoy the challenge...
(constant time off PWM is used in the L297)
Ballendo
And while we're at it; can we get Mariss to describe in more detail
an offhand comment he made some time ago, which has stuck with me...
That being something along the lines of: (Mariss "speaking")
Constant time off pwm sucks (he said something more like "has very
poor performance"<G>). Doing it differently is harder to be sure, but
worth it, and I enjoy the challenge...
(constant time off PWM is used in the L297)
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Alan Marconett KM6VV <KM6VV@a...> wrote:
> Hi Mariss, Paul,
>
> Yes! It does sound like an interesting project. Now all we have
to do
> is "publish" a simple plan (and code) for a PIC or PAL replacement
for
> the '97.
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Tony Jeffree
2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Rothenbush
2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Larry Edington
2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Peter Homann
2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
tonyjeffree
2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
ballendo
2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
mariss92705
2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
tonyjeffree
2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC
Indexer
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC
Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC
Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
scottdbtnet
2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC
next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Alan Rothenbush
2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC
Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298
Steven J. Owen
2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC
Indexer
Keith Bowers
2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
CL
2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
Harvey White
2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer
stevenson_engineers
2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC
Re: Indexer
David A. Frantz
2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer