CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298

on 2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC
>
> No question, I quite often use an R-2R resistor divider instead of
> buying a "real" DAC.
>

In this application, a guy doesn't even need an R2R. By carefully
picking the resistor values for use in a simple divider, all that's
needed for an 1/8 step controller is 8 resistors per axis. A little
less real estate, a little less cost and perhaps most importantly, fewer
uC pins.

The values are not unusual .. a stack of 5% resistors, and a good meter
to measure them with, will easily yield the exact values required to
within 1% of the "correct" reference voltage.

And if a guy was REALLY tight on uC pins and was willing to devote a bit
more PCB real estate to the problem, both channels could be done using only
6 pins.

Alan

--

Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta

Discussion Thread

Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 12:03:31 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 13:06:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 14:58:04 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-09 15:13:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Tony Jeffree 2002-04-09 17:42:32 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-09 18:05:08 UTC Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-04-09 19:05:27 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Larry Edington 2002-04-09 19:35:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Peter Homann 2002-04-09 22:38:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-09 23:25:48 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-12 06:56:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 ballendo 2002-04-14 03:51:26 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 mariss92705 2002-04-14 09:15:24 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 tonyjeffree 2002-04-14 20:12:22 UTC Indexer scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 15:06:36 UTC Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Paul R. Hvidston 2002-04-26 16:00:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:50:49 UTC Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 scottdbtnet 2002-04-26 21:53:18 UTC next, replace the 297 was Re: Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Alan Rothenbush 2002-04-27 09:35:45 UTC Was Chopper circuit - Now ver 3.2, G298 Steven J. Owen 2003-05-09 14:40:04 UTC Indexer Keith Bowers 2003-05-09 16:40:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer CL 2003-05-09 18:07:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer Harvey White 2003-05-09 19:23:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer stevenson_engineers 2003-05-10 02:06:20 UTC Re: Indexer David A. Frantz 2003-05-10 11:35:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Indexer