Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Posted by
Jim Fackert
on 2000-01-10 15:43:57 UTC
> Well, that's just another argument for servos!Actually, it's another argument to get the accel/decel., step and direction
>
> Jon
stuff out of the pc. Use the pc for the user interface, and let it tell the
(stepper OR servo) motor controller where to send the servos, and let them
figure out how fast they can do it without losing synch. You are really
begging for trouble trying to control real time non-linear stuff and
interface stuff with the same processor. There is certainly a good argument
for closed loop servo in place of open loop steppers, particularly where the
motors are near unable to move the mechanism every step. Closed loop
steppers area still a possibility though.
imho...
Jim Fackert
Discussion Thread
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-09 16:48:51 UTC
SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Darrell
2000-01-10 00:04:09 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Dan Mauch
2000-01-10 08:20:40 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Matt Shaver
2000-01-10 10:50:52 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Darrell
2000-01-10 11:21:33 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Jon Elson
2000-01-10 12:23:51 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Darrell
2000-01-10 12:43:02 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-10 13:24:06 UTC
RE: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Jon Elson
2000-01-10 16:39:57 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Matt Shaver
2000-01-10 17:53:53 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-10 18:10:24 UTC
RE: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Les Watts
2000-01-10 20:29:23 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Jon Elson
2000-01-10 23:21:26 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Jim Fackert
2000-01-10 15:43:57 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
tyler@g...
2000-01-11 09:48:30 UTC
Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Jon Elson
2000-01-11 12:16:58 UTC
Re: Re: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-11 12:21:53 UTC
RE: SLO-SYN 12.7 Amp motors