Re: A crazy idea
Posted by
stephen_stallings
on 2002-06-06 07:39:51 UTC
Hi Mariss,
This sounds a bit like the encoding schemes used
to record data on magnetic media. All that I am
aware of have a time sensitive element that
requires a one-shot or a PLL to recover the data.
Can you describe how you would recover the data
in the case of one step CW, pause, one step CCW,
pause, one step CW?
If time is a factor, then the software and the
motor driver would have to agree and conform
to a common time scale. This could be troublesome,
as we already have problems with pulse jitter at
high step rates.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
This sounds a bit like the encoding schemes used
to record data on magnetic media. All that I am
aware of have a time sensitive element that
requires a one-shot or a PLL to recover the data.
Can you describe how you would recover the data
in the case of one step CW, pause, one step CCW,
pause, one step CW?
If time is a factor, then the software and the
motor driver would have to agree and conform
to a common time scale. This could be troublesome,
as we already have problems with pulse jitter at
high step rates.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "mariss92705" <mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Parallel port output CNC programs are limited to 3 or 4 axies
because
> of the limited number of port bits. Each axis requires a STEP and
> DIRECTION bit pair. What if it could be done with a single bit per
> axis where STEP and DIRECTION were combined on the same line? It
then
> would be possible to run 6 to 8 axies.
>
> Here's how it could be done:
>
> (1) 100000000010000000001000... is CW
> (2) 011111111101111111110111... is CCW
>
> In (1), a narrow positive going pulse would be interpreted as a CW
> motion. In (2), a narrow negative going pulse would result in CCW
> motion at the same speed. One would simply invert (1) to generate
(2).
>
> This scheme would place no additional burden on the software or on
> the bandwidth of the now combined STEP/DIRECTION compared to a
> standard STEP pulse line. Decoding hardware in the drive would be
> minimal; just a single quad gate package.
>
> So, what do you think, a crazy idea?
>
> Mariss
Discussion Thread
mariss92705
2002-06-06 07:21:50 UTC
A crazy idea
bjammin@i...
2002-06-06 07:31:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A crazy idea
stephen_stallings
2002-06-06 07:39:51 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
Doug Harrison
2002-06-06 07:45:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A crazy idea
mariss92705
2002-06-06 08:05:44 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
mariss92705
2002-06-06 08:33:15 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
stephen_stallings
2002-06-06 08:43:39 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
mariss92705
2002-06-06 09:10:54 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
waynegramlich
2002-06-06 11:00:45 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
Vajk Fekete
2002-06-06 11:52:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
Larry Edington
2002-06-06 12:04:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-06-06 13:18:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A crazy idea
mariss92705
2002-06-06 14:08:19 UTC
Re: A crazy idea
Carl Mikkelsen, Oasis
2002-06-06 14:48:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A crazy idea
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-06 16:50:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A crazy idea
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-06-06 20:32:40 UTC
Where do we go from here, was [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
bsptrades
2002-06-07 00:46:23 UTC
Where do we go from here, was [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
bjammin@i...
2002-06-07 04:23:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
turbulatordude
2002-06-07 05:15:04 UTC
Where do we go from here, was [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea
bjammin@i...
2002-06-07 05:27:26 UTC
A crazy idea
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-06-07 19:54:37 UTC
RE: Where do we go from here, was [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A crazy idea