Re: steppers
Posted by
jmkasunich
on 2002-07-11 09:32:32 UTC
Oops... from 16x to 4x to 2x - we better stop before it
gets any worse!
gets any worse!
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "mariss92705" <mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Actually it's 2x, not 4x. Though series operation has 1/4 the
> current (at high speeds), it flows thru twice as many turns
> of wire.
>
> Mariss
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "jmkasunich" <jmkasunich@y...> wrote:
>
> >
> > That still means that single or parallel is 4 times faster than
> > series, and 4x is nothing to sneeze at. It's just not 16x faster.
> >
> > John Kasunich
Discussion Thread
Gene
2002-07-10 00:00:20 UTC
steppers
stevenson_engineers
2002-07-10 00:56:02 UTC
Re: steppers
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-10 09:31:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Jon Elson
2002-07-10 10:08:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Steve Blackmore
2002-07-10 11:55:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Jon Elson
2002-07-10 20:24:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Gene
2002-07-11 00:11:10 UTC
steppers
Gene
2002-07-11 00:44:39 UTC
steppers
Joll503@A...
2002-07-11 01:32:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
jmkasunich
2002-07-11 07:34:41 UTC
Re: steppers
mariss92705
2002-07-11 09:24:54 UTC
Re: steppers
jmkasunich
2002-07-11 09:32:32 UTC
Re: steppers
Jon Elson
2002-07-11 10:04:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers
Jon Elson
2002-07-11 10:06:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers
Tony Jeffree
2002-07-11 11:39:29 UTC
Re: steppers
Gene
2002-07-25 20:09:50 UTC
steppers
JanRwl@A...
2002-07-25 20:18:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Gene
2002-07-25 20:21:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
Jon Elson
2002-07-25 21:13:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers
kilroy2k1
2002-07-26 14:51:10 UTC
Re: steppers
Bailey, Paul R
2002-07-26 22:39:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers
Gene
2003-02-14 13:23:42 UTC
steppers