CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2002-07-11 10:04:43 UTC
jmkasunich wrote:

> Series has 4x the inductance of single winding, but parallel
> has the same inductance as single. Think of parallel as if
> it was a bifilar (sp?) winding.

Ah, right, it is, indeed, a bifilar winding, so that unipolar drives
can energize all the poles with just one winding.

> Parallel has lower copper loss due the the lower DC

> resistance, but the inductance is the same.
>
> That still means that single or parallel is 4 times faster than
> series, and 4x is nothing to sneeze at. It's just not 16x faster.

Thanks for the correction. Yes, a 4:1 loss of speed would be a radical
drop in performance in most systems.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Gene 2002-07-10 00:00:20 UTC steppers stevenson_engineers 2002-07-10 00:56:02 UTC Re: steppers Tim Goldstein 2002-07-10 09:31:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Jon Elson 2002-07-10 10:08:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Steve Blackmore 2002-07-10 11:55:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Jon Elson 2002-07-10 20:24:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Gene 2002-07-11 00:11:10 UTC steppers Gene 2002-07-11 00:44:39 UTC steppers Joll503@A... 2002-07-11 01:32:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers jmkasunich 2002-07-11 07:34:41 UTC Re: steppers mariss92705 2002-07-11 09:24:54 UTC Re: steppers jmkasunich 2002-07-11 09:32:32 UTC Re: steppers Jon Elson 2002-07-11 10:04:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers Jon Elson 2002-07-11 10:06:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers Tony Jeffree 2002-07-11 11:39:29 UTC Re: steppers Gene 2002-07-25 20:09:50 UTC steppers JanRwl@A... 2002-07-25 20:18:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Gene 2002-07-25 20:21:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers Jon Elson 2002-07-25 21:13:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] steppers kilroy2k1 2002-07-26 14:51:10 UTC Re: steppers Bailey, Paul R 2002-07-26 22:39:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: steppers Gene 2003-02-14 13:23:42 UTC steppers