Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-08-09 18:22:04 UTC
Richard: If there are no other electrical terminals - just the two wires -
then this is probably an inductor, or "choke" in power-supply parlance.
If it is a transformer, it would have also PRIMARY winding terminals or
wires. Either solder-tags, screw-terminals, lead-wires.
A "transformer" CAN have as few as three wires or terminals, in which case it
would be called an "AUTOtransformer", where the "primary" shares the
"secondary", making for an economy of copper. However, there are several
potentially-dangerous disadvantages to this kind of design. With just two
wires, and if you are certain nothing had been "pulled out" (butchered)
before you got it in your pinkies, it is NOT an autotransformer, and
CERTAINLY not a "transformer"!!! Jan Rowland
then this is probably an inductor, or "choke" in power-supply parlance.
If it is a transformer, it would have also PRIMARY winding terminals or
wires. Either solder-tags, screw-terminals, lead-wires.
A "transformer" CAN have as few as three wires or terminals, in which case it
would be called an "AUTOtransformer", where the "primary" shares the
"secondary", making for an economy of copper. However, there are several
potentially-dangerous disadvantages to this kind of design. With just two
wires, and if you are certain nothing had been "pulled out" (butchered)
before you got it in your pinkies, it is NOT an autotransformer, and
CERTAINLY not a "transformer"!!! Jan Rowland
Discussion Thread
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:01:09 UTC
transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-09 08:21:05 UTC
Re: transformer question
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:56:54 UTC
Re: transformer question
Garry & Maxine Foster
2002-08-09 14:18:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-09 18:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:17:16 UTC
another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 10:28:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:48:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 11:24:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 11:52:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:00 UTC
Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:01 UTC
Re: another transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-11 12:59:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
JJ
2002-08-12 06:33:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 08:58:58 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 11:31:39 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
Keith Bowers
2002-08-12 12:14:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 13:45:04 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-12 13:45:56 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 15:10:42 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 17:48:08 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 15:59:03 UTC
transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-06 17:55:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 19:25:20 UTC
Re: transformer question
Peter Reilley
2006-05-07 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Phil Mattison
2006-05-07 10:14:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Brad Dirks
2006-05-07 16:42:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-07 17:20:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: transformer question