Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: transformer question
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2006-05-07 17:20:51 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
with the
windings in parallel. But, with it in the center-tapped arrangement,
only one half
of the winding conducts at a time, for each half cycle. So, that is
nearly the same
heating potential on the wire. Also, remember these transformers
usually have a
pretty large safety factor to handle momentary current surges as motors and
power supplies start up.
It should work OK, but it is just a bit close. An overvoltage dump
system might
be a good idea.
Jon
>I'm also concerned that the secondary wire size would be suitable forWell, on the 1 KVA used for discussion, the transformer is rated for 9 A
>9A @ the 55.
>
>I am hoping that the 55 less the 1v diode drop = 54 times 1.414 to get
> the 77 or so volts for the G320 would be a good match. (nothing like
>cutting things a little close eh ?)
>
>I guess I will need to look at over voltage and the actual utility
>voltage as well.
>
>
>
with the
windings in parallel. But, with it in the center-tapped arrangement,
only one half
of the winding conducts at a time, for each half cycle. So, that is
nearly the same
heating potential on the wire. Also, remember these transformers
usually have a
pretty large safety factor to handle momentary current surges as motors and
power supplies start up.
It should work OK, but it is just a bit close. An overvoltage dump
system might
be a good idea.
Jon
Discussion Thread
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:01:09 UTC
transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-09 08:21:05 UTC
Re: transformer question
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:56:54 UTC
Re: transformer question
Garry & Maxine Foster
2002-08-09 14:18:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-09 18:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:17:16 UTC
another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 10:28:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:48:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 11:24:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 11:52:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:00 UTC
Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:01 UTC
Re: another transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-11 12:59:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
JJ
2002-08-12 06:33:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 08:58:58 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 11:31:39 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
Keith Bowers
2002-08-12 12:14:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 13:45:04 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-12 13:45:56 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 15:10:42 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 17:48:08 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 15:59:03 UTC
transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-06 17:55:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 19:25:20 UTC
Re: transformer question
Peter Reilley
2006-05-07 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Phil Mattison
2006-05-07 10:14:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Brad Dirks
2006-05-07 16:42:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-07 17:20:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: transformer question