Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Posted by
Phil Mattison
on 2006-05-07 10:14:07 UTC
Not only that, but driving 110v into a 220v primary is going to be less
efficient than if it is run at the rated voltage. The windings and the core
are designed to be near saturation at 220/460v. You will get less power
transfer at a lower primary voltage. Without detailed performance graphs it
would be impossible to calculate the reduction.
--
Phil Mattison
http://www.ohmikron.com/
efficient than if it is run at the rated voltage. The windings and the core
are designed to be near saturation at 220/460v. You will get less power
transfer at a lower primary voltage. Without detailed performance graphs it
would be impossible to calculate the reduction.
--
Phil Mattison
http://www.ohmikron.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Reilley <micrio@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
> I don't think that this is the best way of doing this.
> More below.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Elson" <elson@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 8:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
>
>
> > turbulatordude wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I have a transformer with a lable of 220/460 primariy and 110/220
> >>secondary.
> >>
> >>1kva.
> >>
> >>Would I be able to connect it 110 to get 55 volt ?
> >>
> > Yup, that's right, you'll get 55 VAC from each secondary winding.
> > Note than 55 V AC into a rectifier will give 78 V on the capacitor.
> >
> >> and if so, any idea
> >>what current I could pull out of it ?
> >>
> >>
> > Best is to put the secondary in series and use a pair of big diodes (or
> > half of a bridge rectifier) with the center tap of the windings
> > connected to the
> > - of the capacitor. OK, starting with the KVA rating at the design
> > voltage of
> > 110 V, the current would be I = (KVA * 1000)/V. So, a 1 KVA transformer
> > would provide 1000/110 = 9 A. This may be a little optimistic for
> > continuous
> > duty at full load, but will certainly be fine for most CNC applications.
> >
> > Jon
>
> Using the transformer in this way will work but it will have double
> the heating. The rated current for the output of this 1KVA transformer
is
> 8.33 amps when wired for 120 volts. Therefore each secondary winding
> is rated for 4.17 amps.
>
> When wired as center tap full wave rectifier you are doubling the rated
> current in each winding for half the time. Thus you are drawing 8.33
> amps from the 4.17 amp rated winding but for only half the time. This
> will work but you are doubling the IR loss. Just for argument,
> lets say that you drop 1 volt in the winding at 8.33 amps. That is 8.33
> watts loss. Each winding's loss will be 4.17 watts but there are two
> of them so the total is 8.33 watts.
>
> The alternative connection is to parallel the windings and use a full wave
> bridge rectifier. Your voltage drop would be .5 volts and at 8.33 amps
> your loss would be 4.17 watts in this example.
>
> That type of center tapped rectifier was used back when rectifiers were
> expensive and transformers were cheap. Now a full wave bridge rectifier
> capable of this power load is common and cheap.
>
> Pete.
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:01:09 UTC
transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-09 08:21:05 UTC
Re: transformer question
rekmac
2002-08-09 08:56:54 UTC
Re: transformer question
Garry & Maxine Foster
2002-08-09 14:18:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-09 18:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:17:16 UTC
another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 10:28:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 10:48:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
eforum3001
2002-08-10 11:24:12 UTC
Re: another transformer question
Robert Campbell
2002-08-10 11:52:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:00 UTC
Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-11 10:24:01 UTC
Re: another transformer question
JanRwl@A...
2002-08-11 12:59:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
JJ
2002-08-12 06:33:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 08:58:58 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 11:31:39 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
Keith Bowers
2002-08-12 12:14:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 13:45:04 UTC
CAP's (again) (was Re: another transformer question
caudlet
2002-08-12 13:45:56 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
mariss92705
2002-08-12 15:10:42 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2002-08-12 17:48:08 UTC
CAP's (once again) (was Re: another transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 15:59:03 UTC
transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-06 17:55:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
turbulatordude
2006-05-06 19:25:20 UTC
Re: transformer question
Peter Reilley
2006-05-07 06:46:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Phil Mattison
2006-05-07 10:14:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Brad Dirks
2006-05-07 16:42:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] transformer question
Jon Elson
2006-05-07 17:20:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: transformer question