RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?CODE SAMPLE INCLUDED
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 2002-11-01 21:32:18 UTC
When I view it in Discriminator or back plot it in Vector I see a cut at
depth being shown right at and after the G49 Z0 M5.
That is a cancel of a tool length offset and it is followed a couple of
lines down with a G43 tool length offset. My tempation would be to strip
out all the G41, G42, G43, and G49 and just run the tool paths from tool
centerline and see what happens. You have enough to deal with already
without needing to learn all about offsets and how they are implemented
on each controller.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
depth being shown right at and after the G49 Z0 M5.
That is a cancel of a tool length offset and it is followed a couple of
lines down with a G43 tool length offset. My tempation would be to strip
out all the G41, G42, G43, and G49 and just run the tool paths from tool
centerline and see what happens. You have enough to deal with already
without needing to learn all about offsets and how they are implemented
on each controller.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Yeah, somehow the accel rate got misconfigured and I had to redo
> motor tuning. Deceleration on the Y axis was a little lower than the
> X and Y couldnt keep up.Hence the odd rapid Z safe move to the
> second set of pocketed arcs.
> But I still have a problem where it plunges into the
> material.... This is about half of the code attached, and
> approximately where it
> plunges diagnally into the stock. It's FANUC. MACH1 seems to
> like it (or then again, maybe thats the problem, as Surfcam
> FREE only comes
> with a few PP)
> The feed rate is slowed way down so I could pinpoint(somewhat) where
> the problem occurs.
> I've initially rewound the code in MACH1 and zero'd all axiis, then
> I jog to X0 Y0 Z1 and start the code from there. The code will run
> correctly throughout, with exception to where it crashes at the end
> of the portion of code that Ive included.If I let it run from this
> crash point,all the rest of the toolpaths are executed as they
> should be, but the "real time display" in MACH1 clearly shows the
> tool travel to X0 Y0 Z0 diagnally through the stock ,and then back
> up to safe Z(1), then it executes right from there.
Discussion Thread
jagco1998
2002-11-01 11:31:25 UTC
toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-01 12:00:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
jagco1998
2002-11-01 12:48:14 UTC
Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
j.guenther
2002-11-01 13:03:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-01 13:08:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
jagco1998
2002-11-01 20:07:19 UTC
Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?CODE SAMPLE INCLUDED
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-01 21:32:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?CODE SAMPLE INCLUDED
Jim Brown
2002-11-01 22:14:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?CODE SAMPLE INCLUDED
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-11-02 10:29:45 UTC
Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
Jim Brown
2002-11-02 13:10:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
Ian W. Wright
2002-11-03 07:15:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-11-03 15:04:39 UTC
Re: toolpath creation problem or wrong interpretor setup?