RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2003-01-13 09:49:00 UTC
Most G-Code interpreters parse the complete block before attempting to
execute it. In the case of the block you provided below, the line would be
the equivalent of
G1 X3.0 Y4.3 W1 U1
which is NOT what you explained that you wanted to do. However, If you were
to write
G1 X0.0 Y0.0
X2.0 Y2.0
X3.0 Y4.3 W0.0 U0.0
W1.0 U1.0
it should work as you wanted. IOW, put separate motions on separate lines.
Since G1 is modal, it will be used until another Gxx code is executed.
-- Jerry
execute it. In the case of the block you provided below, the line would be
the equivalent of
G1 X3.0 Y4.3 W1 U1
which is NOT what you explained that you wanted to do. However, If you were
to write
G1 X0.0 Y0.0
X2.0 Y2.0
X3.0 Y4.3 W0.0 U0.0
W1.0 U1.0
it should work as you wanted. IOW, put separate motions on separate lines.
Since G1 is modal, it will be used until another Gxx code is executed.
-- Jerry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mail List [mailto:mlist@...]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:08 AM
> To: 'CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
>
>
> Hi all !
> I'm writing a utility to translate my drawings top G-code. I would like an
> expert opinion:
> is this G-code sintax acceptable ?
>
> G1 X0.0 Y0.0 X2.0 Y2.0 X3.0 Y4.3 W0.0 U0.0 W1.0 U1.0
>
> In this case, I hope that the controller will move the XY point
> from 0,0 to
> 2,2 an then to the final destination at 3,4.3 while in the same time the
> point WU will move from 0,0 to 1.1. The controller will change
> the speed to
> make the points be reached in the same time.
>
>
> What I mean is: is acceptable to give multiple X Y and W U
> movement in the
> same block ?.
> And if yes the number of XY move must match the WU one ?
>
> If the answer will be yes my program is already done !!!
>
> Thanks for your input !
>
> Sandro
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
> members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
Mail List
2003-01-13 09:07:18 UTC
G-code question
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-13 09:49:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Tim Goldstein
2003-01-13 09:52:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Matt Shaver
2003-01-13 10:01:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Jon Elson
2003-01-13 10:48:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
torsten98001 <torsten@g...
2003-01-13 16:02:03 UTC
Re: G-code question
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-13 17:45:34 UTC
Re: G-code question