CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question

Posted by Tim Goldstein
on 2003-01-13 09:52:45 UTC
If you are writing your own control program than any syntax you want is
acceptable. If you are writing a CAM processor to run on other control
programs than no it is totally unacceptable syntax. All the G-code I have
ever seen is always a single destination point on a line and moves are from
the current point to the specified point.

Tim
[Denver, CO]
Sherline products at Deep Discount
Mach1 & DeskCNC with Credit Card ordering
www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
www.KTMarketing.com/DeskCNC


----- Original Message -----

> Hi all !
> I'm writing a utility to translate my drawings top G-code. I would like an
> expert opinion:
> is this G-code sintax acceptable ?
>
> G1 X0.0 Y0.0 X2.0 Y2.0 X3.0 Y4.3 W0.0 U0.0 W1.0 U1.0
>
> In this case, I hope that the controller will move the XY point from 0,0
to
> 2,2 an then to the final destination at 3,4.3 while in the same time the
> point WU will move from 0,0 to 1.1. The controller will change the speed
to
> make the points be reached in the same time.
>
>
> What I mean is: is acceptable to give multiple X Y and W U movement in
the
> same block ?.
> And if yes the number of XY move must match the WU one ?
>
> If the answer will be yes my program is already done !!!
>
> Thanks for your input !
>
> Sandro
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html

Discussion Thread

Mail List 2003-01-13 09:07:18 UTC G-code question Carol & Jerry Jankura 2003-01-13 09:49:00 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question Tim Goldstein 2003-01-13 09:52:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question Matt Shaver 2003-01-13 10:01:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question Jon Elson 2003-01-13 10:48:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-01-13 16:02:03 UTC Re: G-code question Fred Smith <imserv@v... 2003-01-13 17:45:34 UTC Re: G-code question