Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-01-13 10:48:33 UTC
Mail List wrote:
a word (as in
Xnnnn) defined once per block.
G01 X0.0 Y0.0
G02 X2.0 Y2.0
G03 X3.0 Y4.3 W1.0 U1.0
Jon
>Hi all !To my knowledge, no. In most implementations, it is only legal to have
>I'm writing a utility to translate my drawings top G-code. I would like an
>expert opinion:
>is this G-code sintax acceptable ?
>
>G1 X0.0 Y0.0 X2.0 Y2.0 X3.0 Y4.3 W0.0 U0.0 W1.0 U1.0
>
>
a word (as in
Xnnnn) defined once per block.
>In this case, I hope that the controller will move the XY point from 0,0 toG00 W0.0 U0.0
>2,2 an then to the final destination at 3,4.3 while in the same time the
>point WU will move from 0,0 to 1.1. The controller will change the speed to
>make the points be reached in the same time.
>
>
G01 X0.0 Y0.0
G02 X2.0 Y2.0
G03 X3.0 Y4.3 W1.0 U1.0
>NO.
>What I mean is: is acceptable to give multiple X Y and W U movement in the
>same block ?.
>
Jon
Discussion Thread
Mail List
2003-01-13 09:07:18 UTC
G-code question
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-13 09:49:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Tim Goldstein
2003-01-13 09:52:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Matt Shaver
2003-01-13 10:01:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
Jon Elson
2003-01-13 10:48:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G-code question
torsten98001 <torsten@g...
2003-01-13 16:02:03 UTC
Re: G-code question
Fred Smith <imserv@v...
2003-01-13 17:45:34 UTC
Re: G-code question