RE: Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Posted by
Lloyd Leung
on 2003-02-15 20:38:53 UTC
Possibilities that come to mind:
1.) Steps are being missed - shield everything.
2.) Errors in your lead screw - much you can do about this.
3.) Backlash - make sure that you moving towards the direction you're
measuring already.
-----Original Message-----
From: P. J. Hicks [mailto:hickspj467@...]
Sent: February 15, 2003 10:59 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
In following the discussion on calculation vs. trial and error setting of
the spi I would like to relate my experience and ask if it makes sense or is
way out of line.
I initially set the spi by calculation; sherline supplied standard lead
screws 20 tpi X 200 steps per motor revolution X 4x stepping equals 16000
steps per inch, Correct?
However when I measured the travel (at several places along the axis) using
MDI commands my dial indicator repeatedly indicated that 16070 steps were
necessary to get 1 inch of travel. Similar experience (slightly different
numbers) on the other axis. Does this sound reasonable or do I have
something to track down? And what might it be?
PJH
1.) Steps are being missed - shield everything.
2.) Errors in your lead screw - much you can do about this.
3.) Backlash - make sure that you moving towards the direction you're
measuring already.
-----Original Message-----
From: P. J. Hicks [mailto:hickspj467@...]
Sent: February 15, 2003 10:59 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
In following the discussion on calculation vs. trial and error setting of
the spi I would like to relate my experience and ask if it makes sense or is
way out of line.
I initially set the spi by calculation; sherline supplied standard lead
screws 20 tpi X 200 steps per motor revolution X 4x stepping equals 16000
steps per inch, Correct?
However when I measured the travel (at several places along the axis) using
MDI commands my dial indicator repeatedly indicated that 16070 steps were
necessary to get 1 inch of travel. Similar experience (slightly different
numbers) on the other axis. Does this sound reasonable or do I have
something to track down? And what might it be?
PJH
Discussion Thread
P. J. Hicks
2003-02-15 20:20:35 UTC
Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Lloyd Leung
2003-02-15 20:38:53 UTC
RE: Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-15 20:44:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Daniel J. Statman
2003-02-15 22:38:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Jon Elson
2003-02-15 22:46:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-02-16 06:16:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
Hoyt McKagen
2003-02-16 07:07:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch
torsten98001 <torsten@g...
2003-02-16 17:08:00 UTC
Re: Digest Number 2937 - Steps per inch