Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Posted by
Jerry Kimberlin
on 2003-03-04 17:53:24 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
have learned here. It is no good as a manual machine, or so I'm
lead to believe.
and trouble to convert until it is really necessary. Logic says
to use it up, then convert. OTOH, if you aren't able to
interface yourself to the control easily, then put something on
it that you know very well, and eBay the rest.
JerryK
>$500 or free sounds about right for the old stuff, from what I
> Hi All,
>
> looked at a series II at the used machine place today.
>
> It seems like a nice piece and I am considdering the unit if I can
> get a better price.
have learned here. It is no good as a manual machine, or so I'm
lead to believe.
> One concern is wheather it is better to keep the existing HeinemanIf you can learn the control and it works, why go to the expense
> contorls or switch them out to PC control maybe Mach1 or something ?
>
> Supposedly, it was replaced by a new machining center and was working
> when it was retired.
and trouble to convert until it is really necessary. Logic says
to use it up, then convert. OTOH, if you aren't able to
interface yourself to the control easily, then put something on
it that you know very well, and eBay the rest.
JerryK
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2003-03-04 17:08:37 UTC
Bridgeport Series II
Jerry Kimberlin
2003-03-04 17:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Tim Goldstein
2003-03-04 18:36:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Jon Elson
2003-03-04 22:14:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Paul
2003-03-05 10:38:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Shepelak, Hank J
2003-03-06 07:29:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II