Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-03-04 22:14:26 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
were proprietary, but it seems like most of the latest ones handle
standard G-code.
and functions
it has, before throwing it out. Some of the later controls, in general,
are quite
sophisticated, and may be better to use than Mach1 or EMC. Also, I
think all
Heidenhain controls are servo, not stepper.
Jon
>Hi All,Heidenhain? It depends on the model. Some of the older Heidenhain controls
>
>
>looked at a series II at the used machine place today.
>
>It seems like a nice piece and I am considdering the unit if I can
>get a better price.
>
>One concern is wheather it is better to keep the existing Heineman
>contorls or switch them out to PC control maybe Mach1 or something ?
>
>
were proprietary, but it seems like most of the latest ones handle
standard G-code.
>Supposedly, it was replaced by a new machining center and was workingIf it is working, you should at least check it out and see what features
>when it was retired.
>
>
and functions
it has, before throwing it out. Some of the later controls, in general,
are quite
sophisticated, and may be better to use than Mach1 or EMC. Also, I
think all
Heidenhain controls are servo, not stepper.
Jon
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2003-03-04 17:08:37 UTC
Bridgeport Series II
Jerry Kimberlin
2003-03-04 17:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Tim Goldstein
2003-03-04 18:36:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Jon Elson
2003-03-04 22:14:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Paul
2003-03-05 10:38:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II
Shepelak, Hank J
2003-03-06 07:29:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport Series II