Re: G201 death/repair/questions/problems (long post)

John,

A motor drive design is more difficult and time consuming than
designing something like the G2002.

Because there is no project team where the efforts of many people
have to be coordinated, there are no scheduled mileposts that have to
be met. Complicating things further, I do not work on design in a
linear fashion. When I get stale or run up against an obstacle on one
project, I work on a different one. This change of perspective yeilds
the needed renewal or idea for the fallow project.

I am actively working on the G201IP, the BLDC servodrive and
the "classic" servoamp. In two weeks I get the G2002 boards and
sheetmetal which I will have to proof-out and write a manual for.

In short, I can't tell you when it will be done because I don't know
when either.

Mariss


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "jmkasunich"
<jmkasunich@y...> wrote:

> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
> <mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> > Dave,
> >
> > At present the "bullet proof" G201 is just fluorescent phosphors
> > excited into photon emmision by 30kVe electrons inside the glass
> > vacuum containment chamber of my Diamond Pro 2060u monitor:-)
> >
> > Mariss
> >
>
> It seemed to take about 3-4 months for the G2002 to go from
> phosphors to boards. Is the G201-IP somewhere in the same
> neighborhood, or are there other projects ahead of it?
>
> I will _need_ to buy my drives in a few months. I would
> _like_ to buy them sooner, but I really want the IP versions.
> If the IP version will be available in say July, I'll wait
> for it, but if it won't come out until December, or may go
> on the back burner and not come out at all, then I might as
> well get the existing ones. So you see my dilemma. Any
> info would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Kasunich