Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G-Code Syntax Question

caudlet wrote:

>Thanks Jon. Reading the technical documents from NIST is not my idea
>of entertainment. In the list they have a chart of the "order" in
>which commands are executed and it was from that I answered my own
>post. Since I use MACH1 based on the NIST model I thought that might
>be the best place to start. You additions help. Another list member
>has given me some parameters to try in the INI file that are not
>documented in mine (comments in the INI are the only documentation).
>
>

Yeah, no kidding! I have some documents that were hand marked-up by the
implementors
of EMC. Their comments were quite helpful in figuring out their mindset
when they
did this project.

We have decided to make a major push to improve the documentation of EMC,
and persons have been selected to work on it. Some have already started
in the
past few weeks.

G-code specifics, what the ini file really does, and generally how the
whole thing works
are some of the areas that need a lot of work.

Jon