Re: Rotary table DRO
Posted by
Elliot Burke
on 2003-05-12 22:05:02 UTC
babinda01 wrote:
second encoders can be had, 1 arc at 3 m is .014 mm, so that should be good
enough. The RON 800 series has ±1 arc second accuracy, 36000 count/rev,
interpolation in the electronics to get the arc second accuracy.
The electronics in theodolites measure angles to that sort of precision too.
My Wild T3A (non-electronic) reads to 0.2 arc second. Accuracy is probably
on the order of 1 arcsecond. Would probably be too slow for you though, it
takes me about 1 minute to make a reading.
Canon also makes (made?) high resolution encoders. I have a Canon K-1
encoders, 81000 pulses/rev. 36 mm diameter, 50 mm long. The test record
shows a maximum error of about 4 arc seconds. This uses interpolation too.
Interpolation is based on quadrature sine/cosine outputs.
These things aren't cheap.
Could you wrap one of the mylar scales 360 lpi around your table and put and
HEDS readout head on it? I can't remember the source for these. Someone
on this list will- they are frequently recommended. At 360 x 4 = 1440 /inch
resolution that should be more than good enough. A problem is that the
scales are limited in length, you'd have to splice them together.
regards-
Elliot B.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 5/6/2003
>Hello,There are several sources of high resolution rotary encoders. Sub-arc
>
> I was wondering if someone may be able to help me with a problem I
>have at the moment.
>I am trying to add a DRO to my 'little' rotary table. It is 6 meter
>diameter. I am looking to get .05mm accuracy if at all possible. I
>was thinking of puting a rotary encoder onto the main spindle which
>is coupled directly to the table, but to get the resolution I am
>looking for I need approx 400 000 pulses per rev (0.00095 deg). All
>the encoders I have looked at seem to be about 8000 pulses per rev in
>quad. Is it possible to gear an encoder up? If so how (so as to get
>minimal backlash)?
>
>Thanks for your help
>Andrew
second encoders can be had, 1 arc at 3 m is .014 mm, so that should be good
enough. The RON 800 series has ±1 arc second accuracy, 36000 count/rev,
interpolation in the electronics to get the arc second accuracy.
The electronics in theodolites measure angles to that sort of precision too.
My Wild T3A (non-electronic) reads to 0.2 arc second. Accuracy is probably
on the order of 1 arcsecond. Would probably be too slow for you though, it
takes me about 1 minute to make a reading.
Canon also makes (made?) high resolution encoders. I have a Canon K-1
encoders, 81000 pulses/rev. 36 mm diameter, 50 mm long. The test record
shows a maximum error of about 4 arc seconds. This uses interpolation too.
Interpolation is based on quadrature sine/cosine outputs.
These things aren't cheap.
Could you wrap one of the mylar scales 360 lpi around your table and put and
HEDS readout head on it? I can't remember the source for these. Someone
on this list will- they are frequently recommended. At 360 x 4 = 1440 /inch
resolution that should be more than good enough. A problem is that the
scales are limited in length, you'd have to splice them together.
regards-
Elliot B.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 5/6/2003
Discussion Thread
babinda01
2003-05-11 20:15:31 UTC
Rotary table DRO
dvideohd
2003-05-11 21:49:33 UTC
Re: Rotary table DRO
Andrew Mawson
2003-05-12 04:14:09 UTC
Re: Rotary table DRO
ccq@x...
2003-05-12 05:36:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary table DRO
turbulatordude
2003-05-12 05:45:33 UTC
Re: Rotary table DRO
jcc3inc
2003-05-12 07:15:00 UTC
Re: Rotary table DRO
David A. Frantz
2003-05-12 18:35:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotary table DRO
Elliot Burke
2003-05-12 22:05:02 UTC
Re: Rotary table DRO