Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2000-03-10 10:46:06 UTC
In a message dated 10-March-00 09:40:02 Central Standard Time,
tbsmith@... writes:
<< Nope. I used the US Digital 360 lines per inch, which gives me .0006944"
resolution, which I round off in the display to .001. >>
Is this the "New Math"???
tbsmith@... writes:
<< Nope. I used the US Digital 360 lines per inch, which gives me .0006944"
resolution, which I round off in the display to .001. >>
Is this the "New Math"???
Discussion Thread
Mike Gann
2000-03-09 09:52:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
wanliker@a...
2000-03-09 10:11:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
james owens
2000-03-09 12:19:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Mike Gann
2000-03-09 13:10:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Terry May
2000-03-09 14:16:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
JanRwl@A...
2000-03-10 10:46:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
D.F.S.
2000-03-10 11:00:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-10 18:46:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL