Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Posted by
D.F.S.
on 2000-03-10 11:00:41 UTC
>I thought the same thing, then I assumed he was tracking at full resolution,
> From: JanRwl@...
>
> In a message dated 10-March-00 09:40:02 Central Standard Time,
> tbsmith@... writes:
>
> << Nope. I used the US Digital 360 lines per inch, which gives me .0006944"
> resolution, which I round off in the display to .001. >>
>
> Is this the "New Math"???
>
but rounding it to the NEAREST thousandth for display.
If on the other hand the idea is to assume each "Click" is .001, boy is
my face red at missing such a obvious system simplification ;-).
Marc
Discussion Thread
Mike Gann
2000-03-09 09:52:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
wanliker@a...
2000-03-09 10:11:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
james owens
2000-03-09 12:19:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Mike Gann
2000-03-09 13:10:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
Terry May
2000-03-09 14:16:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
JanRwl@A...
2000-03-10 10:46:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
D.F.S.
2000-03-10 11:00:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL
A. G. Eckstein
2000-03-10 18:46:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: DRO ENCODER TOOL