Question Re: Work Offsets
    Posted by
    
      Fred Smith
    
  
  
    on 2003-06-12 15:06:45 UTC
  
  --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Tom Benedict <benedict@h...> 
wrote:
I would do on my Allen Bradley controller:
After positioning to X & Y zero location with your edge finder, Jog
your tool tip to 1.0 inches above the work piece
MDI:
G92 X0.0 Y0.0 Z1.0
All coordinate readouts should now be in part reference.
Work offsets and tool offsets will be screwy after this, but for
that one tool it should be usable. Don't put any tool offsets in
your G-code program or it will mess up the Z locations. If you want
to use multiple tools or multiple parts, use the tool offsets and
work offsets instead of this simplified, single tool method. The AB
is "REALLY" strange about this command which may explain why so many
have trouble with EMC and G92.
On my machine G99 cancels the G92 reference and returns to Absolute
Machine reference, which should be where you set your coordinates
when you home it at startup. G92.2 should have the same effect on
the EMC.
Does that work for you?
Fred Smith - IMService
wrote:
> Ok, let me put this question another way:program
>
> I am generating absolute coordinate G-code (i.e. if I do a "G0X1.0"
> followed by a "G0X0.0", I expect to be at x=0).
>
> What steps do I need to perform so that when I reach a line in my
> that says "G0 X0.000 Y0.000 Z0.000", the tool moves to theworkpiece
> (0,0,0) point?Tom, as the EMC is taken from Allen Bradley framework, here is what
>
I would do on my Allen Bradley controller:
After positioning to X & Y zero location with your edge finder, Jog
your tool tip to 1.0 inches above the work piece
MDI:
G92 X0.0 Y0.0 Z1.0
All coordinate readouts should now be in part reference.
Work offsets and tool offsets will be screwy after this, but for
that one tool it should be usable. Don't put any tool offsets in
your G-code program or it will mess up the Z locations. If you want
to use multiple tools or multiple parts, use the tool offsets and
work offsets instead of this simplified, single tool method. The AB
is "REALLY" strange about this command which may explain why so many
have trouble with EMC and G92.
On my machine G99 cancels the G92 reference and returns to Absolute
Machine reference, which should be where you set your coordinates
when you home it at startup. G92.2 should have the same effect on
the EMC.
Does that work for you?
Fred Smith - IMService
Discussion Thread
  
    inetd_conf
  
2003-06-11 23:36:30 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Fred Smith
  
2003-06-12 06:12:38 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    stephank97
  
2003-06-12 08:04:48 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 10:39:24 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tim Goldstein
  
2003-06-12 11:02:05 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 11:33:23 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 11:36:12 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 11:40:07 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Fred Smith
  
2003-06-12 11:43:13 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tim Goldstein
  
2003-06-12 12:12:22 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 12:33:33 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 12:41:02 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tim Goldstein
  
2003-06-12 13:06:20 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Fred Smith
  
2003-06-12 15:06:45 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Fred Smith
  
2003-06-12 15:07:23 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Keith Rumley
  
2003-06-12 15:20:41 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Tom Benedict
  
2003-06-12 15:53:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Ray Henry
  
2003-06-12 18:27:23 UTC
  Re: Re: Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    LARRY ROBERTSON
  
2003-06-12 20:53:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 21:16:26 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 21:30:50 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 21:38:09 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 21:47:37 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 21:57:28 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 22:04:40 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Jon Elson
  
2003-06-12 22:16:03 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Michael Romeo
  
2003-06-12 22:26:32 UTC
  Question Re: Work Offsets
  
    Raymond Heckert
  
2003-06-13 17:48:30 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets