Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-06-12 22:04:40 UTC
Keith Rumley wrote:
EMC works now is "right". I've used the multiple coord systems when I had
multiple features to be made with the same program at known offsets from the
first one.
ARCHAIC
hack, so the control could tell whether the paper tape was in ASCII or
EIA punch
code format! I always used to use M02, but to save my G92 offsets, I
used M01.
But, I should probably get used to the G10 L2 Pn
Jon
> To make the changes directly to the coordinate system offsets (not G92)This may be the best solution, as some people are very adamant that the way
>from the MDI, use G10 L2 Pn. 'n' is the coordinate system number, 1-9.
>(G54-G59.3)
> A bit odd at first, but no offsets to get deleted. It's become second
>nature to me, because there is no doubt about the values being what I want
>them to be.
>
>
EMC works now is "right". I've used the multiple coord systems when I had
multiple features to be made with the same program at known offsets from the
first one.
>Other EMC things that were strange to me at first:I have never used the % in EMC (I did use it on the A-B 7320). It is an
> Files must begin and end with a '%' sign, unless using M2/M30. M2 & M30
>may be used, if you like the offsets deleted and everything reset to
>defaults when your program finishes. Perhaps you've an errant M2 resetting
>things.
>
ARCHAIC
hack, so the control could tell whether the paper tape was in ASCII or
EIA punch
code format! I always used to use M02, but to save my G92 offsets, I
used M01.
But, I should probably get used to the G10 L2 Pn
Jon
Discussion Thread
inetd_conf
2003-06-11 23:36:30 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Fred Smith
2003-06-12 06:12:38 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
stephank97
2003-06-12 08:04:48 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 10:39:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tim Goldstein
2003-06-12 11:02:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 11:33:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 11:36:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 11:40:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Fred Smith
2003-06-12 11:43:13 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Tim Goldstein
2003-06-12 12:12:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 12:33:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 12:41:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tim Goldstein
2003-06-12 13:06:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Fred Smith
2003-06-12 15:06:45 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Fred Smith
2003-06-12 15:07:23 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Keith Rumley
2003-06-12 15:20:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Tom Benedict
2003-06-12 15:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Ray Henry
2003-06-12 18:27:23 UTC
Re: Re: Question Re: Work Offsets
LARRY ROBERTSON
2003-06-12 20:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 21:16:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 21:30:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 21:38:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 21:47:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 21:57:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 22:04:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Jon Elson
2003-06-12 22:16:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets
Michael Romeo
2003-06-12 22:26:32 UTC
Question Re: Work Offsets
Raymond Heckert
2003-06-13 17:48:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question Re: Work Offsets