CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService???

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2003-08-14 10:05:29 UTC
Tim Goldstein wrote:

>For many an advantage of the DeskCNC software and board is that it works
>with Windows instead of having to dedicate a system to Linux. I have run
>it on my Taig and it have a VERY even and smooth pulse train whether
>connected to my laptop with a USB running XP pro or to my beater desktop
>with a serial cable.
>
>
Well, you don't HAVE to dedicate a system to Linux, you can set up a
dual-boot arrangement fairly easily. (Yes, I wish it was easier, too.
But, it is well worth it to tinker a bit until it works. I have the BDI
Linux
and Windows 95 on my test machine.)

OK, smooth pulse trains at what rate? I run to 45,000 steps/sec on my
minimill,
to get full speed out of the Gecko 201A's.

Jon

Discussion Thread

kdntool 2003-08-13 05:40:19 UTC Pico VS IMService??? Matt Shaver 2003-08-13 10:35:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-13 22:15:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-13 22:48:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? ballendo 2003-08-14 05:33:29 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Fred Smith 2003-08-14 06:41:27 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Fred Smith 2003-08-14 07:51:06 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? turbulatordude 2003-08-14 09:25:08 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 10:05:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 10:22:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService??? kdntool 2003-08-14 11:16:02 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? kdntool 2003-08-14 11:18:39 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 22:37:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService???