CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Pico VS IMService???

on 2003-08-14 09:25:08 UTC
> the USC board was delivering 45,000 steps/second per axis. This,
of course, is not the limit, it can go to about 300,000 steps/second.

That is impressive


> It allows you to connect encoders from the motors to the board,
which then relays the position information back to the CNC computer.
One of the greatest advantages of this is that you can switch back
and forth between CNC and manual operation, and use the computer as a
DRO when in manual.

Another great feature, I assume the computer required encoders and
does not 'see' the steps as the DRO ?



> The USC board also has 14 opto-isolated inputs for limit and home
switches, so you can have separate indications of - and + limits for
each axis.

The site

http://pico-systems.com/univstep.html

that shows the board, lists one parallel port. is that all that
connects the PC to the board ? it seems like you have found a way to
exceed the normal 5 inputs of a simple breakout board.

Dave

Discussion Thread

kdntool 2003-08-13 05:40:19 UTC Pico VS IMService??? Matt Shaver 2003-08-13 10:35:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-13 22:15:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-13 22:48:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? ballendo 2003-08-14 05:33:29 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Fred Smith 2003-08-14 06:41:27 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Fred Smith 2003-08-14 07:51:06 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? turbulatordude 2003-08-14 09:25:08 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 10:05:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 10:22:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService??? kdntool 2003-08-14 11:16:02 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? kdntool 2003-08-14 11:18:39 UTC Re: Pico VS IMService??? Jon Elson 2003-08-14 22:37:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService???