Re: Pico VS IMService???
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2003-08-14 09:25:08 UTC
> the USC board was delivering 45,000 steps/second per axis. This,of course, is not the limit, it can go to about 300,000 steps/second.
That is impressive
> It allows you to connect encoders from the motors to the board,which then relays the position information back to the CNC computer.
One of the greatest advantages of this is that you can switch back
and forth between CNC and manual operation, and use the computer as a
DRO when in manual.
Another great feature, I assume the computer required encoders and
does not 'see' the steps as the DRO ?
> The USC board also has 14 opto-isolated inputs for limit and homeswitches, so you can have separate indications of - and + limits for
each axis.
The site
http://pico-systems.com/univstep.html
that shows the board, lists one parallel port. is that all that
connects the PC to the board ? it seems like you have found a way to
exceed the normal 5 inputs of a simple breakout board.
Dave
Discussion Thread
kdntool
2003-08-13 05:40:19 UTC
Pico VS IMService???
Matt Shaver
2003-08-13 10:35:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService???
Jon Elson
2003-08-13 22:15:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService???
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-13 22:48:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService???
ballendo
2003-08-14 05:33:29 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
Fred Smith
2003-08-14 06:41:27 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
Fred Smith
2003-08-14 07:51:06 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
turbulatordude
2003-08-14 09:25:08 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
Jon Elson
2003-08-14 10:05:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pico VS IMService???
Jon Elson
2003-08-14 10:22:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService???
kdntool
2003-08-14 11:16:02 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
kdntool
2003-08-14 11:18:39 UTC
Re: Pico VS IMService???
Jon Elson
2003-08-14 22:37:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pico VS IMService???