CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: reality check...

on 2003-08-21 20:39:42 UTC
Eire,

Your Kt is 37.51 in-oz. Kv is always Kt/1.351 so your Kv is 27.76V /
1,000 RPM. The max continuous current is 8.9A and the terminal
resistance about 1 Ohm. The max voltage is 60VDC; the effective motor
voltage is 60V - (8.9A times 1 Ohm) or 51.1V

1) This gives you (51.1 / 27.76) times 1,000 RPM or 1,841 RPM.
2) 8.9A times 37.51 in-oz / A gives 334 in-oz of continuous torque.

From (1) and (2), The power output is 1841 * 334 / 1351 or 455W

Another identity is Watts = IPM * Lbs / 531. Solving for Lbs gives:

Lbs = Watts * 531 / IPM. Plugging your numbers in gives:

455 Watts * 531 / 500 IPM = 483 Lbs of Push.

Your pinion circumference is 3.926", at 500 IPM its RPM is 127 RPM.
Meanwhile the motor is turning 1,841 RPM. That means a motor to
pinion reduction ratio of 1841 / 127, or 14.5:1 to get what you want.

Mariss

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Erie Patsellis"
<signworks@c...> wrote:
> OK, given the following:
> Application: Rack & Pinion Gantry router, work area is 8' x 13'
>
> Motor Specs:
>
> 37.51 oz-in/A (Kt)
> 25.0 - 30.5 V/kRPM (Kv)
> Terminal resistance 0.75 - 1.02 Ohms @ 4A
> Max terminal voltage 60V
> Max continuous speed 2100RPM
> Max peak torque 1500 oz-in
> Max peak current 44.5A (unsure)
> Max continuous stall torque at maximum motor temp 300oz-in
> Max continuous current 8.9A
>
> Reduction Calulations:
>
> a 40:1 drive reduction with 24 d.p. rack, 30t 24 d.p. pinion
(effective
> circumfrence of 3.926 inches)
>
> desired rapid of 400-500 ipm (approx 100-125 rpm pinion speed)
>
> I calculate I would need a 2.38:1 ratio from motor to reduction
unit, does
> this ((125*40)/2100=2.380)
> will give me a torque at 20 amps(gecko 340 max current) of
> (37.51*20)/2.38*40=12,608 in oz)or 788 in lbs of force.
> >anybody remember how to calculate force at the tool with a rack &
pinion
> drive?
>
> 1024 count quadrature encoders * 4= 4096 counts per rev, 2100
rpm=35 rps,
> 35*4096=143,360 pulse frequency, in excess of
> mach 2's limit of 45 Khz, I'll have to use a pulse multiplier of
either
> x5(28672 khz) or x10(14336 khz).
>
> If I go with x5, I end up with about 3500 steps per inch, x 10 is
around
> 1750 steps per inch.
>
> any problems with my math???? suggestions as to which way to go
(x5, x10)
>
>
>
> Erie Patsellis
> Shelbyville Design & signworks
> 217-774-4444
> signworks@c... <mailto:signworks@c...>
>
> <mailto:signworks@cond>
>
> Visit our website at: http://www.shelbyvilledesign.com

Discussion Thread

Erie Patsellis 2003-08-19 09:34:13 UTC Electrocraft Motor Specs Chris Baugher 2003-08-19 21:24:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Electrocraft Motor Specs Erie Patsellis 2003-08-20 07:59:15 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Electrocraft Motor Specs Erie Patsellis 2003-08-20 10:22:33 UTC reality check... Leslie M. Watts 2003-08-20 14:07:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reality check... Erie Patsellis 2003-08-20 15:05:45 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reality check... Leslie M. Watts 2003-08-20 16:12:46 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reality check... Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-21 20:39:42 UTC Re: reality check... Chris Baugher 2003-08-30 21:22:51 UTC Tool changing? Raymond Heckert 2003-08-31 19:56:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tool changing? wanliker@a... 2003-08-31 23:24:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tool changing? Jon Elson 2003-09-01 21:54:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tool changing? baugher_c 2003-09-02 18:56:28 UTC Re: Tool changing? Jon Elson 2003-09-02 21:34:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tool changing? Chris Baugher 2003-09-02 22:20:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tool changing? Vince Negrete 2003-09-03 01:30:24 UTC Anyone get EMC on SUSE yet? Vince Negrete 2003-09-03 22:36:54 UTC Anyone get EMC on SUSE yet? Paul 2003-09-04 10:19:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Anyone get EMC on SUSE yet? Vince Negrete 2003-09-04 17:48:38 UTC Anyone get EMC on SUSE yet? Markwayne 2003-09-07 12:47:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Anyone get EMC on SUSE yet?