CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Higher performance systems

Posted by cnchomeman
on 2003-08-28 14:42:40 UTC
I am not too smart but I think it's hard to achieve 1000 ipm with a 5
pitch screw. It would need to turn at 5000 rpm. Unless the screw
was very short(in which case why would you need to go 1000 imp), it
would be tough to keep it from whipping wildly. On the other hand it
could probably be done quite easily with a belt driven gantry or a
rack and pinion type drive system.

I made a gantry router mostly from aluminum extrusion, it has a
38x25x5" work envelope. I used gecko 320s and 115 volt, 1.1 Amp dc
motors. I run the drives at 70 volts. I am guessing the gantry
weighs 40 lbs and it accelerates to 200" per minute (max) in .35
seconds. The screws are 3/4-6 acme screw. The long screw (48")
whips a bit when the axis is at the ends.

Eric

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
<mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Jon,
>
> Indulging in a little "calculator fun" shows 746W (1 HP)
accelerating
> a 396 lb load to 1,000 IPM in 43 milliseconds; acceleration
distance
> is 0.36".
>
> Identities used:
>
> 1) 1 HP = 550 ft-lbs / sec.
> 2) 1G acceleration (a) = 32 ft / sec^2
> 3) v (ft / sec) = at
> 3) s (ft)= at^2 / 2
>
> Mariss

Discussion Thread

Yesamazza@a... 2003-08-28 09:29:24 UTC Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-28 09:52:29 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Jon Elson 2003-08-28 10:30:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Higher performance systems Robert Campbell 2003-08-28 10:49:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-28 13:41:53 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Leslie M. Watts 2003-08-28 14:20:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems cnchomeman 2003-08-28 14:42:40 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-28 16:25:35 UTC Re: Higher performance systems ccq@x... 2003-08-28 18:00:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-28 18:30:37 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Jon Elson 2003-08-28 22:06:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Raymond Heckert 2003-08-28 22:10:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Jon Elson 2003-08-28 22:15:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-29 07:28:42 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Leslie M. Watts 2003-08-29 08:06:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems mmurray701 2003-08-29 08:42:00 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-29 08:56:27 UTC Re: Higher performance systems doug98105 2003-08-29 09:07:05 UTC Re: Higher performance systems Jon Elson 2003-08-29 09:40:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Jon Elson 2003-08-29 09:44:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Leslie M. Watts 2003-08-29 10:05:19 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems Mariss Freimanis 2003-08-29 10:33:52 UTC Re: Higher performance systems ccq@x... 2003-08-29 23:39:53 UTC Saw motor Jon Elson 2003-09-01 21:43:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Saw motor