RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Posted by
Leslie M. Watts
on 2003-08-28 14:20:59 UTC
Mariss,
I think of the accel in terms of minimum corner radii.
Radius= velocity squared/acceleration
... for more calculator fun.
With 20 amps x 70 volts peak one can move a lot of
mass pretty quickly!
I certainly agree with you and Jon that you won't
get to 1000 ips with a 5 TPI ballscrew!
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia USA
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/wf.html
Engineering page:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/shop.html
CNC surplus for sale:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/forsale.html
CNC carved signs:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Mariss Freimanis [mailto:mariss92705@...]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:41 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Jon,
Indulging in a little "calculator fun" shows 746W (1 HP) accelerating
a 396 lb load to 1,000 IPM in 43 milliseconds; acceleration distance
is 0.36".
Identities used:
1) 1 HP = 550 ft-lbs / sec.
2) 1G acceleration (a) = 32 ft / sec^2
3) v (ft / sec) = at
3) s (ft)= at^2 / 2
Mariss
I think of the accel in terms of minimum corner radii.
Radius= velocity squared/acceleration
... for more calculator fun.
With 20 amps x 70 volts peak one can move a lot of
mass pretty quickly!
I certainly agree with you and Jon that you won't
get to 1000 ips with a 5 TPI ballscrew!
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Furniture
Tiger Georgia USA
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/wf.html
Engineering page:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/shop.html
CNC surplus for sale:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/forsale.html
CNC carved signs:
http://home.alltel.net/leswatts/signwp.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Mariss Freimanis [mailto:mariss92705@...]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:41 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Jon,
Indulging in a little "calculator fun" shows 746W (1 HP) accelerating
a 396 lb load to 1,000 IPM in 43 milliseconds; acceleration distance
is 0.36".
Identities used:
1) 1 HP = 550 ft-lbs / sec.
2) 1G acceleration (a) = 32 ft / sec^2
3) v (ft / sec) = at
3) s (ft)= at^2 / 2
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> Yesamazza@a... wrote:
>
> >HI
> > I have built a couple of simple low power stepper systems
and this has
> >inspired me to do something higher performance. I like steppers
in that they
> >are brushless high torque and simple but want closed loop high
speed
> >performance. The servo system I was thinking of was the Geckos
for there low cost
> >easy setup. I wonder about there accuracy and still they have
lower voltage than
> >what I would think. I would like to achieve 500-1000 IPM rapids
with a 5 lead
> >screw. A direct board connection may be the way to go to open up
the choice
> >of amplifiers. What have some of you done for higher performance
machines and
> >what kind of results have you achieved?.. I have machinery and
machining,
> >g-code ect back ground some electronics and test equipment with
little computer
> >knowledge. Any suggestions? Thanks Josh
> >
> >
> 1000 IPM? What kind of machine? For a light weight gantry router,
this
> might
> be doable, but quite difficult. For a Bridgeport-sized machine, I
don't
> think
> this is very practical. It will take HUGE force to accelerate the
> machine to
> that velocity before it reaches the end of travel.
>
> Unless the machine is very light, the Gecko drives don't deliver
enough
> power.
> The peak rating is under 2 HP. You may need more than that for
even a light
> router.
>
> Why do you feel you need these sorts of speeds? Just to prove you
can
> do it?
>
> As for the accuracy of Gecko drives, they are as accurate as any
servo
> system,
> if properly set up. If there is interference on the encoder
signals
> causing it to
> lose steps, then you need to solve that. Some users have run into
this sort
> of trouble, but it is solvable.
>
> Jon
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
Yesamazza@a...
2003-08-28 09:29:24 UTC
Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-28 09:52:29 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Jon Elson
2003-08-28 10:30:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Higher performance systems
Robert Campbell
2003-08-28 10:49:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-28 13:41:53 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Leslie M. Watts
2003-08-28 14:20:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
cnchomeman
2003-08-28 14:42:40 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-28 16:25:35 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
ccq@x...
2003-08-28 18:00:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-28 18:30:37 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Jon Elson
2003-08-28 22:06:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Raymond Heckert
2003-08-28 22:10:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Jon Elson
2003-08-28 22:15:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-29 07:28:42 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Leslie M. Watts
2003-08-29 08:06:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
mmurray701
2003-08-29 08:42:00 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-29 08:56:27 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
doug98105
2003-08-29 09:07:05 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
Jon Elson
2003-08-29 09:40:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Jon Elson
2003-08-29 09:44:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Leslie M. Watts
2003-08-29 10:05:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Higher performance systems
Mariss Freimanis
2003-08-29 10:33:52 UTC
Re: Higher performance systems
ccq@x...
2003-08-29 23:39:53 UTC
Saw motor
Jon Elson
2003-09-01 21:43:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Saw motor