Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
    Posted by
    
      james owens
    
  
  
    on 2000-04-07 16:02:11 UTC
  
  I had thought of using the delete key on this posting!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
My mail looks good at this end, if there is a fault in the setup I didn't know anything about it.
I don't suppose you have a solution?
I don't think it matters what you want to agree is the value of Pi, it doesn't detract from the basis of my argument. The errors still accumulate.
Please fix you mail program.
Make it add line feeds, it is VERY ugly and hard to follow.
Second, I Didn't use an abacus or even a slide rule in school, just
fingers, and I for the most part they had moved away from listing most
figures as fractions to decimal notation before I learned what Pi Was.
I learned it as 3.14149.
In the middle ages they just called it 4 and called it good.
Same goes for many feeds & Speeds formula 3,4 whatever it takes...
My Calculator lists pi as 3.14159265359
or so say Mr. Hewlett & Mr. Packard.
Which for any real purpose agrees with his numbers.
.318 Times pi = .999026463842 I won't complain about billionths of an inch.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
My mail looks good at this end, if there is a fault in the setup I didn't know anything about it.
I don't suppose you have a solution?
I don't think it matters what you want to agree is the value of Pi, it doesn't detract from the basis of my argument. The errors still accumulate.
Please fix you mail program.
Make it add line feeds, it is VERY ugly and hard to follow.
Second, I Didn't use an abacus or even a slide rule in school, just
fingers, and I for the most part they had moved away from listing most
figures as fractions to decimal notation before I learned what Pi Was.
I learned it as 3.14149.
In the middle ages they just called it 4 and called it good.
Same goes for many feeds & Speeds formula 3,4 whatever it takes...
My Calculator lists pi as 3.14159265359
or so say Mr. Hewlett & Mr. Packard.
Which for any real purpose agrees with his numbers.
.318 Times pi = .999026463842 I won't complain about billionths of an inch.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
  
    Larry Edington
  
2000-04-07 11:24:17 UTC
  DRO Encoders
  
    Tim Barnard
  
2000-04-07 11:42:02 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    james owens
  
2000-04-07 13:18:46 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    D.F.S.
  
2000-04-07 14:49:40 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    William Scalione
  
2000-04-07 15:04:38 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    Richard Gardner
  
2000-04-07 15:32:52 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    D.F.S.
  
2000-04-07 15:33:51 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
  
    Jon Elson
  
2000-04-07 15:58:55 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    james owens
  
2000-04-07 16:02:11 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    Bertho Boman
  
2000-04-08 03:58:31 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
  
    Bertho Boman
  
2000-04-08 04:42:56 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
  
    Bertho Boman
  
2000-04-08 05:18:12 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
  
    james owens
  
2000-04-09 11:15:22 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
  
    David A. Forsyth
  
2000-04-10 02:02:48 UTC
  Re: DRO Encoders
  
    Marshall Pharoah
  
2000-04-10 12:50:39 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders