Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
Posted by
james owens
on 2000-04-07 16:02:11 UTC
I had thought of using the delete key on this posting!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
My mail looks good at this end, if there is a fault in the setup I didn't know anything about it.
I don't suppose you have a solution?
I don't think it matters what you want to agree is the value of Pi, it doesn't detract from the basis of my argument. The errors still accumulate.
Please fix you mail program.
Make it add line feeds, it is VERY ugly and hard to follow.
Second, I Didn't use an abacus or even a slide rule in school, just
fingers, and I for the most part they had moved away from listing most
figures as fractions to decimal notation before I learned what Pi Was.
I learned it as 3.14149.
In the middle ages they just called it 4 and called it good.
Same goes for many feeds & Speeds formula 3,4 whatever it takes...
My Calculator lists pi as 3.14159265359
or so say Mr. Hewlett & Mr. Packard.
Which for any real purpose agrees with his numbers.
.318 Times pi = .999026463842 I won't complain about billionths of an inch.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
My mail looks good at this end, if there is a fault in the setup I didn't know anything about it.
I don't suppose you have a solution?
I don't think it matters what you want to agree is the value of Pi, it doesn't detract from the basis of my argument. The errors still accumulate.
Please fix you mail program.
Make it add line feeds, it is VERY ugly and hard to follow.
Second, I Didn't use an abacus or even a slide rule in school, just
fingers, and I for the most part they had moved away from listing most
figures as fractions to decimal notation before I learned what Pi Was.
I learned it as 3.14149.
In the middle ages they just called it 4 and called it good.
Same goes for many feeds & Speeds formula 3,4 whatever it takes...
My Calculator lists pi as 3.14159265359
or so say Mr. Hewlett & Mr. Packard.
Which for any real purpose agrees with his numbers.
.318 Times pi = .999026463842 I won't complain about billionths of an inch.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Larry Edington
2000-04-07 11:24:17 UTC
DRO Encoders
Tim Barnard
2000-04-07 11:42:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
james owens
2000-04-07 13:18:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
D.F.S.
2000-04-07 14:49:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
William Scalione
2000-04-07 15:04:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
Richard Gardner
2000-04-07 15:32:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
D.F.S.
2000-04-07 15:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Jon Elson
2000-04-07 15:58:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
james owens
2000-04-07 16:02:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 03:58:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 04:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 05:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
james owens
2000-04-09 11:15:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
David A. Forsyth
2000-04-10 02:02:48 UTC
Re: DRO Encoders
Marshall Pharoah
2000-04-10 12:50:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders