Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Posted by
Bertho Boman
on 2000-04-08 03:58:31 UTC
I really agree with Ian on the issue of too many CRLFs. People use the auto wrapping feature and then they add extra returns in
a line that is supposed to be continuos. The result is a mess. Ideally, there should not be any extra CRLFs added except
where really wanted for formatting and readability. It should be the reader program's responsibility to format the text to fit
the user's selected window size. That way it will work regardless of what country and what screen size/ format is used. To
please some people, I have auto linefeeds turned on at 72 characters but I think it is wrong for the above reasons. It really
is the viewer's responsibility to format the text the way he/she wants it. (No CRLF entered so far, I just let the auto
line-wrap work)
Bertho Boman
======================================
Ian Wright wrote:
--------- > snip
a line that is supposed to be continuos. The result is a mess. Ideally, there should not be any extra CRLFs added except
where really wanted for formatting and readability. It should be the reader program's responsibility to format the text to fit
the user's selected window size. That way it will work regardless of what country and what screen size/ format is used. To
please some people, I have auto linefeeds turned on at 72 characters but I think it is wrong for the above reasons. It really
is the viewer's responsibility to format the text the way he/she wants it. (No CRLF entered so far, I just let the auto
line-wrap work)
Bertho Boman
======================================
Ian Wright wrote:
--------- > snip
> Conversely to this problem, I get frustrated by messages which are peppered
> with CR/LFs and, when you want to print them out, produce only a slim column
> down the left side of eack page and use reams of paper. This, of course, is
> one of the problems of the Internet - so many different modes of access that
> it is impossible to achieve a universally acceptable standard, however, for
> this very reason, some tolerance is needed and everyone should check their
> own systems carefully before criticising others as there is often a solution
> to the problem lurking somewhere in your own box.
>
> Ian
Discussion Thread
Larry Edington
2000-04-07 11:24:17 UTC
DRO Encoders
Tim Barnard
2000-04-07 11:42:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
james owens
2000-04-07 13:18:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
D.F.S.
2000-04-07 14:49:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
William Scalione
2000-04-07 15:04:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
Richard Gardner
2000-04-07 15:32:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
D.F.S.
2000-04-07 15:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Jon Elson
2000-04-07 15:58:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
james owens
2000-04-07 16:02:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 03:58:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 04:42:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
Bertho Boman
2000-04-08 05:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linefeeds.
james owens
2000-04-09 11:15:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders
David A. Forsyth
2000-04-10 02:02:48 UTC
Re: DRO Encoders
Marshall Pharoah
2000-04-10 12:50:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO Encoders