Re:Home Switches
Posted by
cnczeus
on 2004-01-12 16:20:11 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "industrialhobbies"
<admin@i...> wrote:
switches, I was stating how to achieve very accurate limit switch
homing even at high return rates. The idea that a spring-operated
switch is more accurate when springing on to the switch then
springing off the switch is only a perceived problem. The main
problem is ramping onto a mechanical switch at high speed and
thinking the instant the switch is contacted actually means
something. With the servos seeking to maintain position at high speed
and the mechanical spring delay of the switch .010" repeatability
would seem excellent, where high speed homing to the switch and a
slow exit can easily achieve .0002" repeatability
Jeff
<admin@i...> wrote:
> First, opticals are the way to go, hands down.home
>
> The problem you're experiencing is more than likely because the
> is referenced durring the back off phase of the home. So althoughwith
> the contact is repeatable the "unclick" is not. One way to deal
> this is to put a "one shot" on the home switch. It allows you tofunction
> give a percise pulse on the click. It would incorporate the
> of a de-bounce and an auto back off in one $2 circuit.I was not saying that I had a problem with homing from the limit
>
> Just somthing to think about.
>
> Thanks
> Aaron Moss
> www.IndustrialHobbies.com
>
>
switches, I was stating how to achieve very accurate limit switch
homing even at high return rates. The idea that a spring-operated
switch is more accurate when springing on to the switch then
springing off the switch is only a perceived problem. The main
problem is ramping onto a mechanical switch at high speed and
thinking the instant the switch is contacted actually means
something. With the servos seeking to maintain position at high speed
and the mechanical spring delay of the switch .010" repeatability
would seem excellent, where high speed homing to the switch and a
slow exit can easily achieve .0002" repeatability
Jeff
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Fisher" <dave@d...>times
> wrote:
> > On fitting home switches to our router table, I notice that each
> time
> > I home the table - the X and Y readings differ greatly, some
> upto + -speed
> > 0.5 mm. Seldom never going to zero. Slowing the home traverse
> seems toI
> > make little difference.
> >
> > I would have expected there to be some differnces caused by
> backlash etc but
> > not as much as I am getting.
> >
> > I have used good quality lever type micro switches, but wonder if
> ama
> > suffering from switch bounce or just the mechanical properties of
> microeliminate
> > switch. Would I be better using a slotted opto coupler to
> > mechanical tolerences or any other method ?sofware
> >
> > The table is being driven with Rutex Amps and The Desk CNC
> and
> > controller.
> >
> > Any advice would be appreciated
> >
> > Rgds to all
> >
> > Dave Fisher
Discussion Thread
Troy
2004-01-03 11:42:01 UTC
rack and pinion advice
balsaman_cnc
2004-01-03 12:51:26 UTC
Re: rack and pinion advice
Robert Campbell
2004-01-03 15:19:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rack and pinion advice
JanRwl@A...
2004-01-03 18:47:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rack and pinion advice
Erie Patsellis
2004-01-03 19:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rack and pinion advice
ballendo
2004-01-03 20:09:15 UTC
Re: rack and pinion advice
Troy
2004-01-04 07:35:19 UTC
Re: rack and pinion advice
Dave Fisher
2004-01-10 20:15:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Home Switches
John Johnson
2004-01-11 08:44:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Home Switches
Todd Meidinger
2004-01-11 09:20:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Home Switches
Torsten
2004-01-11 11:30:31 UTC
Re:Home Switches
Dale Emery
2004-01-11 13:55:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Home Switches
cnczeus
2004-01-11 15:02:01 UTC
Re:Home Switches
industrialhobbies
2004-01-11 20:41:36 UTC
Re:Home Switches
Fred Smith
2004-01-11 20:41:51 UTC
Re:Home Switches
Dave Fisher
2004-01-11 21:54:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Home Switches
cnczeus
2004-01-12 16:20:11 UTC
Re:Home Switches