CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos.

on 2004-03-11 12:51:43 UTC
Peter,

Jon is right; it does work that way and nicely too. Here's the math:

Motor: 5 mH, 2 Ohm, 80VDC rated (about a 500W output motor)
Drive: 25 kHz switching frequency

Ripple current (p-p) = V / 2*f*L = 80 / 2 * 25,000 * 0.005 = 0.32A
RMS current (triangle waveform) = I (p-p)/4 = 0.08A
I^2*R heating = 0.08^2 * 2 = 0.0128 Watts

The motor will be stone-cold when stopped and unloaded.

Mariss



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Reilley" <micrio@m...>
wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Elson" <elson@p...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large
servos.
>
>
> >
> > Kim Lux wrote:
> >
> > >Comments below.
> > >
> > >On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:53, Jon Elson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>The Gecko doesn't have output filters, which causes 80 V (or
whatever
> the
> > >>DC supply voltage is) square waves to be applied to the motor's
> terminals
> > >>at all times.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >I think you mean whenever the motor is commanded to move by the
drive.
> > >You are saying that the drive controls the motor velocity/power
with
> > >pulse width modulation and that the voltage applied is the supply
> > >voltage, ie 80V in this case.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, at idle there is a square wave where 50% of the time there
is 80 V
> > across
> > the motor one way, the other 50% of the time the polarity is
reversed.
> The
> > motor experiences a triangle current wave of some amplitude
determined
> > but the applied voltage and the motor's inductance (and the
switching freq
> > of 25 KHz.)
> >
>
> I think that you are wrong on that one. While it could work that
way, i.e.
> that motor
> would not move, the IR loss would be maximized. In other words
the motor
> would
> always disapate the maximum heat even when it is stopped. Not a
very
> efficient system.
>
> There are three states in the drive; full on plus, off, and full on
minus.
> When there motor
> is stopped there is no pulsing of the power. When the motor is
moving the
> power is pulsed
> with one polarity only. The duty cycle of that pulsing determines
the
> power output of the motor.
>
> > >If the motor had 80V across it all the time, it would be moving
all the
> > >time.
> > >
> > >
> > But, it reverses polarity 25,000 times a second. The net current
> > averages out
> > to zero.
> >
>
> The current would average to zero but the power loss would not.
>
> > >
> > >
> > >>This may cause high circulating currents at 25 KHz to flow
> > >>through the transistors.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >I think the only time current should be flowing through the
<output>
> > >transistors is when power is being supplied to the motors.
> > >
> > Yes, seems reasonable, but MOST PWM full-bridge driver schemes use
> > the 50% duty cycle scheme.
> >
>
> This would inply that the power supplies must supply full current
all the
> time.
> They do not.
>
> > >
> > >It may also cause high currents to flow just to
> > >the windings if the capacitance to ground is low, or if there
are EMI
> > >filters in the motor. It might be necessary to put an inductor
in series
> > >with the motor.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >I'm not following this argument.
> > >
> > >
> > If the motor's inductance is too small, the triangle wave current
> > becomes large.
> > The solution is to increase the inductance with a series inductor.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Finally, if the Gecko failed when stopping, the problem is due
to the
> > >>back EMF of the spinning motor PLUS the extra voltage created by
> > >>currents in the motor inductance produces a DC supply voltage
GREATER
> > >>than the DC supply normally produces. In other words, during
> deceleration
> > >>of large motors and heavy inertial loads, the bus voltage can
rise to
> > >>dangerous
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >I've had this argument with other people. Here is my
understanding:
> > >
> > >a) the terminal voltage of a DC <servo> motor is equal to the
IR "drop"
> > >of the armature, plus the KV product of the motor's speed.
> > ><big snip>
> > >
> > >Therefore the terminal voltage during deceleration can never
really be
> > >greater than the supply voltage.
> > >
> > >
> > This is true in a completely linear system. But, this is NOT a
linear
> > system,
> > it is a switched-mode system, and inductance becomes VERY
important.
> >
> > So, the motor can be thought of as the ideal DC motor, as you
described
> > above,
> > PLUS an inductor in series with it! Now, if you are extracting
energy
> from
> > the spinning motor, you are applying the reverse polarity from
the power
> > supply across the motor for short periods, and allowing the
current to
> > build to a large value. Then, you reverse the polarity for a
while as
> part
> > of the PWM switching cycle, so that the motor back EMF and the
power
> > supply are of the same polarity. But, there's also that
inductance with
> the
> > large current in it. As the polarity reverses, the like polarity
of the
> > two sources (DC supply through transistors and the back EMF) would
> > act to reduce the large current in the inductor. AND, when you
reduce
> > the current flowing in an inductor, you get a large voltage which
acts
> > to raise the motor terminal voltage appreciably, as it forces a
large
> > current back into the power supply.
> >
> > >Think of the decelerating motor as a generator being turned at a
> > >constant speed and the deceleration being a bigger and bigger
load on
> > >the motor. As the load increases, the terminal voltage drops.
> > >
> > >
> > But, if you were to short the motor for an instant, and then when
the
> > current
> > became very large, break the circuit, you'd get a big spark!
This is
> > exactly
> > what happens in the simple PWM servo system every PWM cycle.
> >
> > These systems are always on, one polarity or the other. The PWM
refers
> > to the duty cycle of the waveform. There are other designs that
provide
> > for the source transistors to be off for part of the cycle, but
the
> > Gecko 320/340
> > is not of that type.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
wanliker@a...,
> timg@k...
> > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j...
> [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Discussion Thread

cutthroatplasmaco 2004-03-09 13:52:57 UTC LARGE Gantry table Robert Campbell 2004-03-09 15:09:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table Leslie M. Watts 2004-03-09 15:19:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table Leslie M. Watts 2004-03-09 16:04:46 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table Jon Elson 2004-03-09 20:17:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table Doug Fortune 2004-03-09 21:54:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table Elliot Burke 2004-03-10 08:34:50 UTC re:RE: LARGE Gantry table Kim Lux 2004-03-10 09:22:37 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. brunoian1127 2004-03-10 09:32:50 UTC Re: LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Kim Lux 2004-03-10 10:08:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Lindsay 2004-03-10 10:08:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:RE: LARGE Gantry table Jon Elson 2004-03-10 10:52:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Jon Elson 2004-03-10 10:54:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Kim Lux 2004-03-10 12:14:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Kim Lux 2004-03-10 12:14:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Elliot Burke 2004-03-10 16:16:23 UTC re:Re: re:RE: LARGE Gantry table billbryden 2004-03-10 21:16:54 UTC re:Re: re:RE: LARGE Gantry table Jon Elson 2004-03-10 21:29:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Jon Elson 2004-03-10 21:44:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. ballendo 2004-03-10 23:02:49 UTC Re: LARGE Gantry table ballendo 2004-03-11 09:10:30 UTC Re: re:RE: LARGE Gantry table Leslie M. Watts 2004-03-11 11:34:34 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: re:RE: LARGE Gantry table Peter Reilley 2004-03-11 12:33:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Mariss Freimanis 2004-03-11 12:51:43 UTC Re: LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Kim Lux 2004-03-11 13:41:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Jon Elson 2004-03-11 19:32:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos. Peter Reilley 2004-03-11 22:02:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LARGE Gantry table: Geckos on large servos.