CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting

Posted by jess@p...
on 2004-04-28 21:06:59 UTC
Thanks Tony,

So that would be 1076 / 16 = 67.25 lb-in
and 67.25 / 12 = 5.604156 lb-ft

What is the significance or difference or how lb-in is defined compared to
lb-ft and the same would apply to oz-in I would assume?

Oh and thanks for the software link to convert.

Regards and thanks again.
Jess


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Jeffree" <tony@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting


> Divide oz-in by 16 to get lb-in; then divide by 12 to get lb-ft.
>
> 1 NM is 141.6116 oz-in.
>
> There's a really excellent freeware conversion program called "Convert"
> that will do it all for you (& much more besides) downloadable from here:
>
> http://www.joshmadison.com/software/
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> At 17:02 28/04/2004, you wrote:
> >What is 1076 oz-in in ft-lbs or Nm ? What is the conversion?
> >
> >Regards
> >Jess
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.9.10 - Release Date: 28/4/2004
>
>



--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.9.10 - Release Date: 28/4/2004

Discussion Thread

skunkphallus 2004-04-27 05:52:45 UTC Thinking of retrofitting shyningnight@y... 2004-04-27 07:26:54 UTC Re: Thinking of retrofitting Andy Wander 2004-04-27 07:42:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting Roy J. Tellason 2004-04-27 08:04:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting jess@p... 2004-04-28 10:59:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting Tony Jeffree 2004-04-28 11:31:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting washcomp 2004-04-28 11:36:56 UTC Re: Thinking of retrofitting Dan Mauch 2004-04-28 12:22:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting Armistead, Matthew D - Norman, OK - Cont 2004-04-28 12:55:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting Armistead, Matthew D - Norman, OK - Cont 2004-04-28 12:58:05 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting David Dearing 2004-04-28 13:09:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting Michael Johnston 2004-04-28 13:09:30 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting jess@p... 2004-04-28 21:06:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting jess@p... 2004-04-28 21:12:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting jess@p... 2004-04-28 21:48:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thinking of retrofitting