[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Posted by
Brian Bartholomew
on 2000-05-07 20:24:02 UTC
> I have read the notes about patent issues and am now concerned. INearly all of the patents in the software field are crazy, and whether
> know there are a few cases of crazy patents being taken seriously-
> like Amazon.com patenting the use of cookies.
>
> I know this group is not a source of real legal advice, but are we
> at any risk if we start a public project to do a conversational
> program? Is there any company doing a conversational program and not
> paying royalties?
you'll be prosecuted depends on how much money you have to take.
Non-profit groups who don't challenge the powerful have historically
been mostly ignored. For further analysis, see http://lpf.ai.mit.edu
Brian
Discussion Thread
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-07 20:24:02 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Matt Shaver
2000-05-07 20:47:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Elson
2000-05-07 22:38:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Elson
2000-05-07 22:57:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-07 22:57:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-08 03:08:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-08 04:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
John Guenther
2000-05-08 05:12:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 06:17:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 06:23:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Anderson
2000-05-08 06:55:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
ptengin@a...
2000-05-08 10:49:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents