CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents

Posted by Tim Barnard
on 2000-05-08 06:23:40 UTC
You are correct. If the patent holder wishes, they could shut down everyone
you mentioned plus many more companies. It just depends if the patent holder
knows that the other companies exist and if they are taking sales away from
the patent holder's company. They also must look to see which company has
more cash. You can go out of business trying to protect your patent.

A patent is a legal right to sue !

TAB

-----Original Message-----
From: John Guenther [mailto:jguenther@...]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 5:14 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents


I have been following this thread this morning and have a real problem with
all this patent stuff. Sure people have a right to protect their designs
but if you come up with a new way to build your widget in the current
climate you might as well keep it to yourself. There is nothing new in the
world, only new ways to use existing technology. If you take this seriously
then any form of machine control not manufactured or sold by one of the
patent holding corporations should be pulled of the market. THAT'S A BUNCH
OF BULL!! What I am hearing is that our patent laws and the corresponding
legal system are only designed to prevent new development and invention, not
promote it. I guess Dan Mauch should go out of business, Tom Kulga should
not have developed his DRO board and none of the low cost CNC solutions
should exit. In fact from what you have all been saying NIST should stop
the EMC project because that too violates some patent somewhere. Here we
are, one of the greatest nations in the world but we can't develop anything
new because of the damn lawyers!!

Ok, I am off my soap box for now.

John Guenther
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Bartholomew [mailto:bb@...]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 7:23 AM
To: cad_cam_edm_dro@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents


> For what I could find out, it cost around $200,000 to fight
> Hurco. About half of what Hurco wanted to settle out of court.

Wow, that's cheap. Panels on IP law appear from time to time at
computer conferences, and the minimum price they report for an
innocent company to either defend their patent, or defend themselves
against an illegitimate patent, is "most of a million dollars".

Do you know if Haas recovered the $200K from Hurco?

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
bill,
List Manager



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3012/3/_/423600/_/957787921/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.

Addresses:
Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
bill,
List Manager

Discussion Thread

Brian Bartholomew 2000-05-07 20:24:02 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Matt Shaver 2000-05-07 20:47:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Jon Elson 2000-05-07 22:38:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Jon Elson 2000-05-07 22:57:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Brian Bartholomew 2000-05-07 22:57:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Brian Bartholomew 2000-05-08 03:08:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Tim Barnard 2000-05-08 04:04:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Tim Barnard 2000-05-08 04:04:23 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Tim Barnard 2000-05-08 04:04:28 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Brian Bartholomew 2000-05-08 04:20:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents John Guenther 2000-05-08 05:12:01 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Tim Barnard 2000-05-08 06:17:43 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Tim Barnard 2000-05-08 06:23:40 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents Jon Anderson 2000-05-08 06:55:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents ptengin@a... 2000-05-08 10:49:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents