RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Posted by
Tim Barnard
on 2000-05-08 04:04:20 UTC
The judge said that Hurco's patents were based on PC technology that was
available at the time the were formulated. Since Hurco did not revise their
patents to keep up with the changes in the technology, they were null and
void.
TAB
available at the time the were formulated. Since Hurco did not revise their
patents to keep up with the changes in the technology, they were null and
void.
TAB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Elson [mailto:jmelson@...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 10:41 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
>
>
>
>
> Ron Ginger wrote:
>
> > I have read the notes about patent issues and am now concerned. I know
> >
> > there are a few cases of crazy patents being taken seriously- like
> > Amazon.com patenting the use of cookies.
> >
> > I know this group is not a source of real legal advice, but are we at
> > any risk if we start a public project to do a conversational program?
> > Is
> > there any company doing a conversational program and not paying
> > royalties?
>
> Apparently, Haas didn't pay, and has been vindicated in court. I don't
> know whether it was determined that the Haas product doesn't
> infringe, or that the Hurco patents were overly broad, which sounds
> awully likely. But, that doesn't mean that the court made that
> determination.
>
> Jon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Would you like to save big on your phone bill -- and keep on saving
> more each month? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you
> Long Distance
> rates which fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2567/3/_/423600/_/957764337/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for
> the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
Discussion Thread
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-07 20:24:02 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Matt Shaver
2000-05-07 20:47:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Elson
2000-05-07 22:38:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Elson
2000-05-07 22:57:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-07 22:57:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-08 03:08:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 04:04:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Brian Bartholomew
2000-05-08 04:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
John Guenther
2000-05-08 05:12:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 06:17:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Tim Barnard
2000-05-08 06:23:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
Jon Anderson
2000-05-08 06:55:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
ptengin@a...
2000-05-08 10:49:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents