RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents

Most companies figured it was less costly to pay Hurco than to fight them in
court. Gene Haas had a different opinion.

TAB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Elson [mailto:jmelson@...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 11:00 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CPNC and Patents
>
>
>
>
> Matt Shaver wrote:
>
> > 1. Read this:
> >
> > http://www.computerip.com/final.pdf
> >
>
> Well, what happened with this suit? It makes claims almost as
> outrageous
> as Hurco, implying a vast conspiracy! I have some doubts that large
> companies would pay off millions on a worthless patent.
>
> Jon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 72% off on Name brand Watches!
> Come and buy today and get free shipping!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4011/3/_/423600/_/957765467/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for
> the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>