CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: current rating of transformers

on 2004-10-25 09:47:02 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Andy Wander <awander@v...>
wrote:
> Yeah, but....
>
> I still say that the thing that limits the secondary current is the
wire
> gauge used for the secondary winding.
>
> I don't think many transformers are built using wire that's a lot
heavier
> than needing fro rated output current. Therefore, dropping the
primary
> voltage(thereby dropping the secondary voltage) doesn't mean you
can now
> pump more current through it to "get back" up to the VA rating.
>
> Andy Wander
> Verrex Corporation
>

Hi Andy,

You are exactly correct in that the wires in a tranformer are exactly
the correct size for the maximum of the transformer.

But heat the real limiting factor. too small a wire, and they
overheat and short out.

The transformer houses pay engineers to design these things and not
add extra copper for the fun of it. Imagine the cost of adding a
useless extra pound per transformer.


But, as Jon had said, you can connect these things for maximum power
or what much reduced power you need.

Since I'm looking at a 21 amp 48 volt supply, that could be a single
48 volt transformer.

As was said, if I am lighing 24 volt DC lignts on a 2 diode
rectifier, then the transformer will only send power at 1/2 cycles
and run much cooler.

In this case, the transformers I am looking into are listed as having
a higher rating with a choke input filter than with a capacitor one.

What I am learning from this thread is that transformers are not
always selected without design calculations.

Darn, life was so much easier when I thought I knew everything but
really knew very little.

Dave

Discussion Thread

turbulatordude 2004-10-24 08:57:44 UTC current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 09:25:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-24 09:42:30 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-24 11:14:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 20:03:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 20:28:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers learnningstuff 2004-10-24 23:05:59 UTC Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-24 23:30:59 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 05:12:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 05:22:39 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 09:47:02 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-25 10:15:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 10:45:06 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 11:28:34 UTC Re: current rating of transformers John Dammeyer 2004-10-25 11:46:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers kmslinda 2004-10-25 14:40:53 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-25 22:59:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 23:27:20 UTC Re: current rating of transformers caudlet 2004-10-26 07:02:12 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Fred Smith 2004-10-26 07:19:04 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-26 09:18:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Stephen Wille Padnos 2004-10-26 11:47:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-26 14:51:36 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-26 18:57:13 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-26 23:07:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-27 06:14:34 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Roy J. Tellason 2004-10-27 10:11:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-27 10:36:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers