CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: current rating of transformers

on 2004-10-25 23:27:20 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> turbulatordude wrote:
>
> >Since I'm looking at a 21 amp 48 volt supply, that could be a
single
> >48 volt transformer.
> >
> >
> >
> Do you really NEED 1008 Watts? Continuously? Note that most of
these
> unregulated supplies can deliver twice the continuous rating for a
couple
> of seconds every minute without damage. So, in almost all cases,
you
> can use a supply half the size of your worst-case peak current draw.
> That's what the capacitors are for is to supply peak currents.
>
> Jon

NO.

you are exactly correct.

I have 3 Gecko's and want to have the ability to run them with a
power supply. at 60% of rated current, they only need 12.6 amps, and
that assumes the Z is in full speed motion a concurrently with the X
and Y.

Seems like a true 10 amps would be more than enough.

The MPJA transformers are $18.00 each and to serial and parallel them
I could get 11 amps with 4 units.

This does offer the possibility of 24 volts, 36 volts and 48 volts
out of the secondary so that is pretty neat. not required, but neat.

Any idea where to get a larger single transformer at a better price ?

Dave

Discussion Thread

turbulatordude 2004-10-24 08:57:44 UTC current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 09:25:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-24 09:42:30 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-24 11:14:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 20:03:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-24 20:28:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers learnningstuff 2004-10-24 23:05:59 UTC Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-24 23:30:59 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 05:12:26 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 05:22:39 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 09:47:02 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-25 10:15:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers Andy Wander 2004-10-25 10:45:06 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 11:28:34 UTC Re: current rating of transformers John Dammeyer 2004-10-25 11:46:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers kmslinda 2004-10-25 14:40:53 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-25 22:59:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers turbulatordude 2004-10-25 23:27:20 UTC Re: current rating of transformers caudlet 2004-10-26 07:02:12 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Fred Smith 2004-10-26 07:19:04 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-26 09:18:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Stephen Wille Padnos 2004-10-26 11:47:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-26 14:51:36 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-26 18:57:13 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-26 23:07:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Bloy2004 2004-10-27 06:14:34 UTC Re: current rating of transformers Roy J. Tellason 2004-10-27 10:11:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers Jon Elson 2004-10-27 10:36:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers