Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-10-27 10:36:31 UTC
Roy J. Tellason wrote:
connection, it would be a BIG problem, possibly resulting in flaming
components
flying about the room! Literally! If you carefully manage the wiring
in a system
where the drivers are totally isolated (it can be done with Gecko
drives, but is
not automatic as the err/res pin is NOT isolated!) then it can be fine.
But, if
you were not aware of this bonding of the + output to ground, and had the
- of the driver connected to computer ground, it could be quite spectacular,
with a 25 A power supply.
Jon
>On Wednesday 27 October 2004 02:08 am, Jon Elson wrote:If your drives have some common between the negative power and the computer
>
>
>>Bloy2004 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>To make it easier this URL will take you to the power supply:
>>>http://tinyurl.com/53ut7
>>>
>>>
>>Gee, I hope they are not positive ground! Note the -48 V @ 25 A.
>>That is real common for the Telcom people, they run with ground
>>and Minus 48 V. If the supplies have a floating output, then they will
>>be fine.
>>
>>
>
>Why would that be a problem?
>
>
connection, it would be a BIG problem, possibly resulting in flaming
components
flying about the room! Literally! If you carefully manage the wiring
in a system
where the drivers are totally isolated (it can be done with Gecko
drives, but is
not automatic as the err/res pin is NOT isolated!) then it can be fine.
But, if
you were not aware of this bonding of the + output to ground, and had the
- of the driver connected to computer ground, it could be quite spectacular,
with a 25 A power supply.
Jon
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2004-10-24 08:57:44 UTC
current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-24 09:25:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
turbulatordude
2004-10-24 09:42:30 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Andy Wander
2004-10-24 11:14:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-24 20:03:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-24 20:28:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
learnningstuff
2004-10-24 23:05:59 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
turbulatordude
2004-10-24 23:30:59 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Andy Wander
2004-10-25 05:12:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
Andy Wander
2004-10-25 05:22:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
turbulatordude
2004-10-25 09:47:02 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-25 10:15:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
Andy Wander
2004-10-25 10:45:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
turbulatordude
2004-10-25 11:28:34 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
John Dammeyer
2004-10-25 11:46:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] current rating of transformers
kmslinda
2004-10-25 14:40:53 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-25 22:59:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
turbulatordude
2004-10-25 23:27:20 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
caudlet
2004-10-26 07:02:12 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Fred Smith
2004-10-26 07:19:04 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-26 09:18:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Stephen Wille Padnos
2004-10-26 11:47:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Bloy2004
2004-10-26 14:51:36 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Bloy2004
2004-10-26 18:57:13 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-26 23:07:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Bloy2004
2004-10-27 06:14:34 UTC
Re: current rating of transformers
Roy J. Tellason
2004-10-27 10:11:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers
Jon Elson
2004-10-27 10:36:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: current rating of transformers