Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Posted by
Dan Falck
on 2000-05-13 11:00:19 UTC
On Sat, 13 May 2000, you wrote:
So far all I have tried with it is Vector cad/cam and internet explorer. With
vector it seems just a tad bit slower, but still faster than it was on my
amd233 k6. This machine is an AMD k6 400 with mandrake 7.0 and 128 meg of ram.
The way that I have win4lin currently set up it is only using 24 meg ram for
windows. I will try to find that setting and increase it to see if things
speed up. The way I understand it, I can run it up to 64 meg max, but that's
fine for what I'm doing. Heck, 24 meg seems to be fine right now.
With internet explorer, the web pages seemed to load fine. I went to slashdot
and newsguy and it seemed pretty smooth.
So, I think this is going to work great. Now there is NO reason to reboot
back into the original windows98 that came on this machine.
I am not sure how things will work with the RTlinux kernel. That's a big
question for me right now, since I haven't had any luck with RTlinux on 2.2.14.
Dan
> Dan,Darrell,
> How is the speed of windows in this setup? Is it what you would expect from
> the computer that it is on? If the speed is not bad, this sounds like fun.
> Darrell
So far all I have tried with it is Vector cad/cam and internet explorer. With
vector it seems just a tad bit slower, but still faster than it was on my
amd233 k6. This machine is an AMD k6 400 with mandrake 7.0 and 128 meg of ram.
The way that I have win4lin currently set up it is only using 24 meg ram for
windows. I will try to find that setting and increase it to see if things
speed up. The way I understand it, I can run it up to 64 meg max, but that's
fine for what I'm doing. Heck, 24 meg seems to be fine right now.
With internet explorer, the web pages seemed to load fine. I went to slashdot
and newsguy and it seemed pretty smooth.
So, I think this is going to work great. Now there is NO reason to reboot
back into the original windows98 that came on this machine.
I am not sure how things will work with the RTlinux kernel. That's a big
question for me right now, since I haven't had any luck with RTlinux on 2.2.14.
Dan
Discussion Thread
lawrence jackman
2000-05-13 09:47:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-13 10:39:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Darrell
2000-05-13 10:44:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-13 11:00:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
William Scalione
2000-05-13 11:21:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
lawrence jackman
2000-05-13 12:38:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-13 13:18:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-13 13:39:39 UTC
Ray's Subroutine module for EMC
Tim Goldstein
2000-05-13 16:31:35 UTC
May12rev.tgz
Darrell
2000-05-13 17:35:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-13 17:35:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] May12rev.tgz
Tim Goldstein
2000-05-13 18:06:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Jon Elson
2000-05-13 21:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] alternative Windoze emulator for Linux $50
Dan Falck
2000-05-14 05:35:02 UTC
EMC files on onelist/egroups web server
Dan Falck
2000-05-14 20:27:25 UTC
linuxcnc.org back online